--- Comment #10 from law at redhat dot com 2006-01-26 17:14 ---
Fixed with today's patch to tree-vrp.c
--
law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
S
--- Comment #8 from law at redhat dot com 2006-01-26 17:14 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] ACATS ICE cxac0004 in
set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:161 on x86-linux
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 15:12 -0700, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> That "fixes" cxac004, but causes c99004a to fail!
As Laur
--- Comment #7 from law at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-26 17:14 ---
Subject: Bug 25900
Author: law
Date: Thu Jan 26 17:14:22 2006
New Revision: 110261
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110261
Log:
PR ada/25900
* tree-vrp.c (extract_range_from_assert)
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|law at gcc dot gnu dot org |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |law at gcc dot gnu
--- Comment #6 from law at redhat dot com 2006-01-24 22:50 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] ICE on ACATS cxac004 in
Tree-VRP
On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 22:15 +, laurent at guerby dot net wrote:
>
> --- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net 2006-01-24 22:15 ---
> c
--- Comment #5 from laurent at guerby dot net 2006-01-24 22:15 ---
c99004a randomly fails PR21317, unrelated to your fix, so go ahead :).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25900
--- Comment #4 from law at redhat dot com 2006-01-24 22:12 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] ACATS ICE cxac0004 in
set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:161 on x86-linux
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 21:00 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
Weird.
I've got a little hack to reject t
