--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-17
20:23 ---
> No because Ada front-end is creating:
> signed_char <= 127 which is always true, removing this from fold would not
> change the problem as it will still be optimized away.
Where do you see signed_char?
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-17
20:02 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Well, it seems to me that the culprit is fold, no?
No because Ada front-end is creating:
signed_char <= 127 which is always true, removing this from fold would not
change the pro
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-17
19:56 ---
Well, it seems to me that the culprit is fold, no?
else if (!in_gimple_form
&& TREE_INT_CST_HIGH (arg1) == signed_max_hi
&& TREE_INT_CST_LOW (arg1) ==
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-10
21:26 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> with this workaround stage3 fails :/
Yes that is PR 21994 and then we are blocked by 21923.
--
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-06-10 21:23 ---
with this workaround stage3 fails :/
(...)
../../xgcc -B../../ -c -g -O2 -fPIC -W -Wall -gnatpg a-ncelfu.ads -o
a-ncelfu.o
a-ngcefu.adb: In function 'Ada.Numerics.Complex_Elementary_Functions.Sqrt':
a-ng
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-10
18:52 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
as the thread said this is only a workaround.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21959
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-06-10 16:59 ---
> hmm, I can't test the 4.1 bootstrap with -fwrapv due to xgcc error.
Try this to enable -fwrapv by default:
--- misc.c 01 Jun 2005 10:00:47 +0200 1.102
+++ misc.c 08 Jun 2005 14:58:25 +0200
@@
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-06-10 16:57 ---
> hmm, I can't test the 4.1 bootstrap with -fwrapv due to xgcc error. Try this
> to enable -fwrapv by default: --- misc.c 01 Jun 2005 10:00:47 +0200
> 1.102 +++ misc.c08 Jun 2005 14:58:25 +0200
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-06-09 11:59 ---
hmm, I can't test the 4.1 bootstrap with -fwrapv due to xgcc error.
make -C obj-amd64-pld-linux \
bootstrap \
GCJFLAGS="%{rpmcflags}" \
BOOT_ADAFLAGS="%{rpmcflags} -fwrapv" \
GNATLIBCF
