[Bug ada/116916] improve wording for predefined packages in messages

2024-10-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116916 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/116916] improve wording for predefined packages in messages

2024-10-09 Thread simon at pushface dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116916 --- Comment #4 from simon at pushface dot org --- I now realise that "predefined" means "defined in the ARM". Obviously System.Interrupts.Xh3irq isn’t defined in the ARM, so GNAT must define "predefined" as "Ada, Interfaces, System, and their de

[Bug ada/116916] improve wording for predefined packages in messages

2024-10-02 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116916 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Confusing error message |improve wording for |