at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: zhouyi04 at ios dot cn
GCC build triplet: x86_32-*-FreeBSD-6.3
GCC host triplet: x86_32-*-FreeBSD-6.3
GCC target triplet: x86_32-*-FreeBSD-6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39165
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: zhouyi04 at ios dot cn
GCC build triplet: Linux i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
GCC host triplet: Linux i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
GCC target triplet: Linux i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from zhouyi04 at ios dot cn 2008-03-05 07:03 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Sorry there are some problem with 1st patch because the edge e
maybe removed after redirection.
24
| \ /
\ 5
\ |
6
In function redirect_edge_succ_nodup, the edge from 5 to 6 will
be
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: zhouyi04 at ios dot cn
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35452
--- Comment #5 from zhouyi04 at ios dot cn 2008-01-05 11:15 ---
from svn update, it is fixed.
make bootstrap OK
--
zhouyi04 at ios dot cn changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from zhouyi04 at ios dot cn 2008-01-05 09:54 ---
Subject: Re: redundant if expression in
find_conditional_asserts
Thanks,
I think I am now able to follow
http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#testing
Sincerely yours
Zhouyi Zhou
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #2 from zhouyi04 at ios dot cn 2008-01-04 06:31 ---
Subject: Re: redundant if expression in
find_conditional_asserts
Hey ubizjak!
Please provide a regression test for me, it is the first time I have a
chance to patch gcc, Thanks a lot :)
Patch against gcc-4.3.0
zhouyi04 at ios dot cn
GCC build triplet: i486-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i486-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i486-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34649
--- Comment #9 from zhouyi04 at ios dot cn 2007-08-06 08:40 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I try to compile my giving C program using gcc-4.2.1, the problem still exists.
As my solution 1 suggests:
a caller function is inlinable only if all of its callee functions are
inlinable. while
--- Comment #4 from zhouyi04 at ios dot cn 2007-05-10 05:33 ---
Dear Pinsky
In addition,
The problem will still exists even add a inline to line 1 of the program,
unless you add a static to line 1.
Sincerely yours
Zhouyi Zhou
--
zhouyi04 at ios dot cn changed:
What
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: zhouyi04 at ios dot cn
GCC build triplet: Linux i686 GNU/Linux
GCC host triplet: Linux i
rity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: zhouyi04 at ios dot cn
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31077
12 matches
Mail list logo