--- Comment #2 from zeev dot tarantov at gmail dot com 2008-09-12 14:24
---
Thank you so much and sorry for the spam in bugzilla. Is there anything like
lint that would have helped me understand the mistake, without actually
grokking the documentation?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
4.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: zeev dot tarantov at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37492
--- Additional Comments From zeev dot tarantov at gmail dot com 2005-03-18
20:47 ---
I forgot to say gcc was compiled with "-march=pentium3 -O3".
I tried it now on gcc 3.3.5 and got the same deal.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From zeev dot tarantov at gmail dot com 2005-03-18
20:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=8420)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8420&action=view)
testcase unexpected output
this is what I get from "gcc -march=i386 -O3 -S -g
--- Additional Comments From zeev dot tarantov at gmail dot com 2005-03-18
20:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=8419)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8419&action=view)
testcase expected output
this is what I get from "gcc -march=i486 -O3 -S -g opcode.c -o
--- Additional Comments From zeev dot tarantov at gmail dot com 2005-03-18
20:26 ---
Created an attachment (id=8418)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8418&action=view)
testcase source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20540
et
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: zeev dot tarantov at gmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20540
