[Bug tree-optimization/44900] [4.5 Regression] The variable of SSE will be broken

2010-07-14 Thread yottui at yahoo dot co dot jp
--- Comment #23 from yottui at yahoo dot co dot jp 2010-07-15 03:45 --- (In reply to comment #22) > Please file that as a different bug. May I enter comment #15 as a new bug to Bugzilla? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44900

[Bug tree-optimization/44900] [4.5 Regression] The variable of SSE will be broken

2010-07-14 Thread yottui at yahoo dot co dot jp
--- Comment #16 from yottui at yahoo dot co dot jp 2010-07-14 12:24 --- This is also the wrong result with MinGW gcc 3.4.5. I'm expecting that all component of v will be 2500. 4.4.4 of MacPorts, 4.5.0 of MacPorts, 4.4.0 of MinGW and 4.5.0-1 of MinGW were worked fine. This time,

[Bug tree-optimization/44900] [4.5 Regression] The variable of SSE will be broken

2010-07-14 Thread yottui at yahoo dot co dot jp
--- Comment #15 from yottui at yahoo dot co dot jp 2010-07-14 09:22 --- I found the similar case with gcc 4.4.4 of MacPorts and gcc 4.4.0 of MinGW. -- begin testcase -- // g++ -O -msse2 test.cpp typedef long long __m128i __attribute__ ((__vector_size__ (16), __may_alias__)); struct

[Bug tree-optimization/44900] [4.5 Regression] The variable of SSE will be broken

2010-07-11 Thread yottui at yahoo dot co dot jp
--- Comment #10 from yottui at yahoo dot co dot jp 2010-07-11 23:11 --- Please use '-m32' if host is x64. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44900

[Bug c++/44900] The variable of SSE will be broken

2010-07-10 Thread yottui at yahoo dot co dot jp
--- Comment #1 from yottui at yahoo dot co dot jp 2010-07-10 15:12 --- Also, I reproduced it on gcc45 of MacPorts 1.9.1 with '-O -m32 -msse' compiler options. At that time, I modified errno of the test code. --- test.old.cpp2010-07-10 23:27:22.0 +0900 +++ te

[Bug c++/44900] New: The variable of SSE will be broken

2010-07-10 Thread yottui at yahoo dot co dot jp
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: yottui at yahoo dot co dot jp http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44900