https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68374
xyzdragon at fastmail dot fm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45896
xyzdragon at fastmail dot fm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xyzdragon at fastmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70213
--- Comment #2 from xyzdragon at fastmail dot fm ---
to
bool( isConst() )
even though this shouldn't be necessary, because isConst already has return
type bool.
(Sorry for split post, I accidentally pressed the send button)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70213
--- Comment #1 from xyzdragon at fastmail dot fm ---
I just noticed, that as a workaround the it works to change
isConst()
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: xyzdragon at fastmail dot fm
Target Milestone: ---
I'm really a complete novice on the topic of concepts, but I read
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3701.pd
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: xyzdragon at fastmail dot fm
Target Milestone: ---
This bug seems to be related to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45615 but the code example is a
bit different, so I'
