Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: xonar.leroux at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 46073
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46073&action=edit
Minimal case that triggers the bug
Compiling with: `g++ t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69289
--- Comment #5 from Paul le roux ---
On the GCC trunk version on godbolt.org there is still a difference between the
two cases, but it seems to have turned around. The noprofile case has
vector::resize partially inlined and in the profile case, i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81171
Paul le roux changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: xonar.leroux at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41608
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41608&action=edit
Smallest case which still results in segfault
Running with
'g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69289
--- Comment #4 from Paul le roux ---
I compiled gcc/g++ from svn and the slowdown is still present without the
--profile-generate flag. (But both are faster than what they were :D )
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69289
--- Comment #2 from Paul le roux ---
(In reply to Paul le roux from comment #1)
> When copying the timings got switched around the --generate-profile is the
> faster one.
Ignore that. I just quickly looked at the total usage, but that includes t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69289
Paul le roux changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xonar.leroux at gmail dot com
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: xonar.leroux at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 37349
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37349&action=edit
Source
Running