http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
--- Comment #17 from Max Reitz ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #16)
> That's exactly what I wrote.
Ah, okay, sorry I misunderstood.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
--- Comment #15 from Max Reitz ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #14)
> The relevant option is -ffreestanding, not -nostdlib.
If you're referring to me, I'll be glad to cite my OP for you :D
> Compiling the attached trivial memcpy imp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
--- Comment #13 from Max Reitz ---
(In reply to Brooks Moses from comment #12)
> Now, if this replacement still happens when you compile with -nostdlib, that
> would be a bug since it becomes legal code in that case. But that's
> somewhat of a se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
--- Comment #7 from Max Reitz 2013-04-09 13:20:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2013, xanclic at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
> >
> > --- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
--- Comment #5 from Max Reitz 2013-04-09 13:02:19
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Just add -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns to the already long list of
> options
> you need for compilation of certain routines in your C library.
Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56888
Bug #: 56888
Summary: memcpy implementation optimized as a call to memcpy
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
