https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105867
Gustaw Smolarczyk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wielkiegie at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105329
Gustaw Smolarczyk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wielkiegie at gmail dot com
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: wielkiegie at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 52795
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52795&action=edit
The rep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91490
Gustaw Smolarczyk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wielkiegie at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96934
--- Comment #1 from Gustaw Smolarczyk ---
It seems that part of this issue was already reported in another bug report
(though the report is about flexible array members, the comment does not
reference them):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: wielkiegie at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
GCC 9 (but not <= 8 and not >= 10, including trunk) miscompiles the following
piece of code. I have
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: wielkiegie at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
There are many similar bugs that I have found in the bugzilla (see below), but
this one differs from the other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81860
--- Comment #8 from Gustaw Smolarczyk ---
Hello,
Can I expect the fix to be backported to the gcc 7 branch? gcc 7.3.0 has
apparently shipped with the bug still present.
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: wielkiegie at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42095
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42095&action=edit
Annotat
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: wielkiegie at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41987
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41987&action=edit
Minimized test case that rep
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: wielkiegie at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hello,
I have a problem when using builtins (like __builtin_clz()) inside constexpr
functions.
Example:
constexpr int foo(int x
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: wielkiegie at gmail dot com
__attribute__ ((init_priority (x))) makes it possible to order the
initialization of global objects. However, gcc rejects this attribute on
globals of non-clas
12 matches
Mail list logo