https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119856
--- Comment #2 from Walter Spector ---
Having suffered through porting Fortran programs from one compiler to another,
and one system to another, uncountable times over the past 50 years, I am one
who doesn't like "legacy" extensions to be enable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119856
Bug ID: 119856
Summary: Missing commas in I/O formats not diagnosed by default
at compile time.
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114611
Bug ID: 114611
Summary: H edit descriptor should flag as error with -std-f95
(or higher)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504
Walter Spector changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||w6ws at earthlink dot net
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57360
--- Comment #9 from Walter Spector ---
It appears that Lfortran issues a message for this case. See:
https://github.com/j3-fortran/fortran_proposals/issues/83#issuecomment-1906266587
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57360
--- Comment #8 from Walter Spector ---
Hi,
It is a good point. The message is helpful when issued within a procedure.
At module scope, it doesn't mean much since everything at that level is SAVE
anyway. This is similar to what happens in C:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57360
--- Comment #5 from Walter Spector ---
IMHO this should be a "surprising" warning when -Wsurprising is specified.
The message should suggest adding an explicit SAVE attribute to make the code
clear.
