[Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation

2008-09-04 Thread w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
--- Comment #14 from w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de 2008-09-04 16:48 --- Created an attachment (id=16223) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16223&action=view) compiler error on valid code might point to the problem causing the seg fault -- http://gcc.

[Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation

2008-09-03 Thread w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
--- Comment #13 from w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de 2008-09-03 19:30 --- Created an attachment (id=16214) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16214&action=view) very small testcase this is a ten-line testcase clearly pointing to a problem with type-res

[Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation

2008-09-01 Thread w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
--- Comment #11 from w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de 2008-09-01 16:39 --- Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation Hi, I have added some substance to the reduced testcase, so that now actual code is generated. You find it in the attached file. It compiles well under g

[Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation

2008-09-01 Thread w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
--- Comment #10 from w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de 2008-09-01 16:14 --- Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation Hi, thanks for taking the time to look at my problem. I did try with version 4.2 and fared no better. Versions up to 4.0.x compile ok. Let me know if I can

[Bug c++/37314] seg violation

2008-09-01 Thread w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
--- Comment #1 from w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de 2008-09-01 15:41 --- Created an attachment (id=16180) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16180&action=view) the ii file the file you requested in your instructions on how to submit a bug report --

[Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation

2008-09-01 Thread w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
gnu dot org ReportedBy: w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314