[Bug tree-optimization/114622] [12/13/14/15 regression] memcmp -Wstringop-overread false positive with -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114622 Willy Tarreau changed: What|Removed |Added CC||w at 1wt dot eu --- Comment #2 from Wil

[Bug middle-end/98503] [11/12 regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with global variables at -O2 since r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503 --- Comment #19 from Willy Tarreau --- Hello Richard, Thanks for looking at this old issue. > that means next_step will do the bad access of 'head' using the struct ref > type. Actually there's no bad access, as if you look closely, next_step(

[Bug middle-end/98503] [11/12 regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with global variables at -O2 since r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503 --- Comment #14 from Willy Tarreau --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #13) > The patch was rejected so we'll have to live with a confusing warning. sadly it's not the first one and I don't count the number of bugs I have introduced in my

[Bug c/98503] [11 regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with global variables at -O2 since r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503 --- Comment #9 from Willy Tarreau --- Hi Richard, indeed, the &curr->list == &head is the test for end of list that prevents any bad access from happening. I know that usually the right way to do this is by using a list element, but sometimes i

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 98503, which changed state. Bug 98503 Summary: [11 regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with global variables at -O2 since r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503 Wha

[Bug c/98503] [11 regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with global variables at -O2 since r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503 Willy Tarreau changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 98503, which changed state. Bug 98503 Summary: [11 regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with global variables at -O2 since r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503 Wha

[Bug c/98503] [11 regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with global variables at -O2 since r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503 Willy Tarreau changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c/98503] [11 regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with global variables at -O2 since r11-3306-g3f9a497d1b0dd9da

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503 --- Comment #4 from Willy Tarreau --- Hi Martin, I'm sorry but I'm missing something, as this is how linked lists are implemented everywhere nowadays. I'm not actually casting the pointer, it was made for simplification. I'm only following the l

[Bug c/98503] [11 regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with global variables at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503 --- Comment #1 from Willy Tarreau --- Re-reading godbolt's version more closely, it's just 1 day old (I thought I read 20201010) so the issue is still valid.

[Bug c/98503] New: [11 regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with global variables at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98503 Bug ID: 98503 Summary: [11 regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with global variables at -O2 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma