http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822
vlukas at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vlukas at gmx dot de
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58639
vlukas at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vlukas at gmx dot de
--- Comment
: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vlukas at gmx dot de
When using the libstdc++ debug mode, some invalid iterator uses are not
diagnosed, e.g. the following program compiles and runs without aborting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57207
vlukas at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vlukas at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57172
vlukas at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vlukas at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55801
--- Comment #2 from vlukas at gmx dot de 2013-01-08 10:46:55 UTC ---
Thank you for working on this. Strangely, I just tested this again and could
remove one line from my testcase:
class C;
thread_local C O
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55801
Bug #: 55801
Summary: ICE with thread_local after ill-formed forward
declaration
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55800
Bug #: 55800
Summary: Link failure with thread_local in unnamed namespace
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55677
--- Comment #6 from vlukas at gmx dot de 2012-12-14 18:55:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 28962
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28962
Slight modification of original submitters attachment
Modification of origi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55677
vlukas at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vlukas at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55580
--- Comment #1 from vlukas at gmx dot de 2012-12-03 22:42:06 UTC ---
I believe the following reduced snippet reproduces the original crash:
---
template struct V
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55443
Bug #: 55443
Summary: ICE for some placement new expressions inside noexcept
operator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53497
Bug #: 53497
Summary: Partial ordering of function templates does not order
lvalue/rvalue references correctly
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
--- Comment #3 from vlukas at gmx dot de 2006-08-21 12:04 ---
A variation of the code crashes GCC 4.2.0 20060820 (experimental) with a
different ICE:
--
template
void f()
{
typedef void (t)();
t a = x;
}
void g()
{
f();
}
--
This produces the following output:
--
b.cc: In
--- Comment #2 from vlukas at gmx dot de 2006-08-21 11:01 ---
>Indeed a dup of that PR.
>
>*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 27807 ***
I do not mean to sound impertinent, but with GCC 4.2.0 20060820 (experimental),
I can not reproduce bug 27807. However the code I
assigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: vlukas at gmx dot de
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28787
16 matches
Mail list logo
