[Bug other/72815] libmpx on i386

2017-04-19 Thread vicencb at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72815 --- Comment #6 from vicencb at gmail dot com --- Yes, the host (and build) system uses glibc, target system uses musl. Thanks for the fix! Should I test it or you already did?

[Bug other/72815] libmpx on i386

2017-04-19 Thread vicencb at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72815 --- Comment #4 from vicencb at gmail dot com --- I can confirm that with the provided list of steps it is still reproducible. To obtain the buildroot version use this: cd /tmp git clone git://git.buildroot.net/buildroot cd buildroot git

[Bug other/72815] libmpx on i386

2017-04-18 Thread vicencb at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72815 --- Comment #2 from vicencb at gmail dot com --- I think the bug was triggered with buildroot version eb1a30a3d92c8ddbcc295cb48226604d6d881e25 following these steps: cat << EOF > .config BR2_x86_i686=y BR2_DL_DIR="/media/sources

[Bug other/72815] New: libmpx on i386

2016-08-05 Thread vicencb at gmail dot com
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vicencb at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Hello, 'struct _libc_fpstate' is anonymous when getting its 'sizeof' in libmpx/mpxrt/mpxrt.h:52 #define XSAVE_OFFSET_IN_FPMEMsizeof (struct _libc_fpstate) Which results in a compilation error. Thanks!

[Bug c/71713] New: "initializer element is not constant" with nested casts

2016-06-30 Thread vicencb at gmail dot com
ity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vicencb at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Hello, With this type definitions: struct Str1 { int i; }; struct Str2 { struct Str1 *m; }; Gcc fails to compile this: const struc

[Bug ada/67086] [5/6 regression] RE_Not_Available error when building ghdl-0.32

2016-01-09 Thread vicencb at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67086 --- Comment #3 from vicencb at gmail dot com --- Hello, If this obsolete No_Run_Time pragma makes the compiler to fail and ask the user to report a bug against GCC, then I would suggest completely deprecating it by disallowing it. In my opinion

[Bug ada/67086] New: When building ghdl-0.32 the error "RE_Not_Available rtsfind.adb:296" is reported.

2015-07-31 Thread vicencb at gmail dot com
NCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: vicencb at gmail dot com CC: tgingold at free dot fr Target Milestone: --- Host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Target: x86_