http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48940
--- Comment #5 from Zachary Vance 2011-05-10
10:27:08 UTC ---
As long as folks are aware of this behavior and consider it proper, I
personally have no objection. I don't see any large benefit from changing it;
I was just confused when other peop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48940
--- Comment #2 from Zachary Vance 2011-05-10
09:48:47 UTC ---
Sorry to be cryptic as to the part of the standard I was talking about. Yes, I
was referring to report 391/589.
Yes, I agree that g++ should not issue an error for this file running
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48940
Summary: GCC fails to issue expected error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.
