[Bug bootstrap/61764] gcc fails to build

2014-07-09 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61764 --- Comment #1 from Udo Steinberg --- This is with SVN version 212406.

[Bug bootstrap/61764] New: gcc fails to build

2014-07-09 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de Created attachment 33096 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33096&action=edit Full build log The build process fails at this point: echo timestamp > s-opti

[Bug c++/61660] static_assert triggering when it should not

2014-06-30 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61660 --- Comment #5 from Udo Steinberg --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > That is still correct s is not a constant expression. Yes, I'm saying a similar warning should be emitted for x.

[Bug c++/61660] static_assert triggering when it should not

2014-06-30 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61660 --- Comment #3 from Udo Steinberg --- Created attachment 33035 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33035&action=edit Testcase 2 Then, similar to this new test case, I would expect something like the following: g++ -std=gnu++11

[Bug c++/61660] New: static_assert triggering when it should not

2014-06-30 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de Created attachment 33034 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33034&action=edit Test case In the attached test case, for each compile-time constant value x, o

[Bug tree-optimization/55044] New: Compile error in tree-ssa

2012-10-23 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55044 Bug #: 55044 Summary: Compile error in tree-ssa Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: tree-ssa Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/51290] Bogus warning: zero as null pointer constant with static_cast

2011-11-24 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51290 --- Comment #4 from Udo Steinberg 2011-11-24 12:04:58 UTC --- Confirmed to be fixed.

[Bug c++/51290] New: Bogus warning: zero as null pointer constant

2011-11-23 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51290 Bug #: 51290 Summary: Bogus warning: zero as null pointer constant Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug rtl-optimization/47698] CMOV accessing volatile memory with read side effect

2011-02-11 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47698 Udo Steinberg changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23308|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/47698] CMOV accessing volatile memory with read side effect

2011-02-11 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47698 --- Comment #1 from Udo Steinberg 2011-02-11 15:40:27 UTC --- Created attachment 23308 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23308 Testcase

[Bug rtl-optimization/47698] New: CMOV accessing volatile memory with read side effect

2011-02-11 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47698 Summary: CMOV accessing volatile memory with read side effect Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization

[Bug c++/46682] New: __sync_bool_compare_and_swap generates wrong code

2010-11-26 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46682 Summary: __sync_bool_compare_and_swap generates wrong code Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: un

[Bug target/46187] Invalid instruction suffix generated by %z

2010-10-26 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46187 --- Comment #1 from Udo Steinberg 2010-10-26 15:03:01 UTC --- Bug #31768 is probably related.

[Bug target/46187] New: Invalid instruction suffix generated by %z

2010-10-26 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46187 Summary: Invalid instruction suffix generated by %z Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug other/45996] -falign-functions=X does not work

2010-10-13 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45996 --- Comment #3 from Udo Steinberg 2010-10-13 12:19:57 UTC --- According to the gcc manpage: -Os disables the following optimization flags: -falign-functions -falign-jumps -falign-loops -falign-labels -freorder-blocks

[Bug other/45996] -falign-functions=X does not work

2010-10-13 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45996 --- Comment #2 from Udo Steinberg 2010-10-13 12:06:32 UTC --- Created attachment 22029 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22029 Testcase gcc -Os -falign-functions=32 foo.cc -o foo nm foo | c++filt | grep func_ 004004f6 T

[Bug other/45996] New: -falign-functions=X does not work

2010-10-12 Thread us15 at os dot inf.tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45996 Summary: -falign-functions=X does not work Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc