--- Comment #4 from ullner at gmail dot com 2010-03-08 17:59 ---
That still doesn't make sense.
1. Why does enabling -O3 (O1 and O2 does the same) remove this problem?
2. Why does storing the value in an intermediate variable make any change in
what the result is?
Consider witho
--- Comment #2 from ullner at gmail dot com 2010-03-07 22:10 ---
Hm? How does calling std::pow with different types behave differently? The
value can be stored fine if one does "double dValue = std::pow(2.0, 64);long
long llValue = dValue;" // OK
--
http://gcc.gnu.or
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ullner at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43284
