https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119458
--- Comment #1 from Tymi ---
Seems to produce the optimal result with -march=haswel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119458
--- Comment #3 from Tymi ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> I think this works as designed, sub vs. dec is a target tuning decision.
> I'm not sure whether atomics should behave special in any way here.
Hmm yea, and since -mtun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119458
Bug ID: 119458
Summary: Optimisation miss: atomic_ref increment
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119072
--- Comment #2 from Tymi ---
Ah okay. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119072
Bug ID: 119072
Summary: GCC rejects type declaration inside decltype specifier
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116802
--- Comment #9 from Tymi ---
It is indeed not related to whether Clang compiles or not. I used clang as a
reference that this is not an issue with other compilers, not as the base of
the issue. The base of the issue, is that I have forgotten abo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116802
--- Comment #7 from Tymi ---
"This issue is indeed invalid then" is not misleading. The issue is literally
invalid. `is` is a standard function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116802
--- Comment #5 from Tymi ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Tymi from comment #2)
> > Oh, did not see that detail. It does compile with clang though.
>
> By clang you mean with libstd++ with clang or libc++?
The def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116802
--- Comment #2 from Tymi ---
Oh, did not see that detail. It does compile with clang though.
