https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
--- Comment #14 from Tim Rentsch ---
(In reply to James Kuyper from comment #11)
That last message was in reply to James Kuyper in #11. I
was expecting a reference would be added automatically.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
Tim Rentsch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||txr at alumni dot caltech.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83584
--- Comment #16 from Tim Rentsch ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #14)
> -pedantic is not designed to reject all programs that are not strictly
> conforming, but to enable emitting all _required_ diagnostics. I
> don't think a convers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83584
Tim Rentsch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||txr at alumni dot caltech.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892
--- Comment #22 from Tim Rentsch ---
[responding to comments from rguent...@suse.de in Comment 20]
> GCC already implements this if you specify -fno-strict-aliasing.
The main point of my comments is that the ISO C standard requires
the behavior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892
--- Comment #21 from Tim Rentsch ---
[responding to comments from jos...@codesourcery.com in Comment 19]
>> Five: The answer to the question is clearly No. The example code
>> is very much on point to the "one special guarantee" clause, and
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892
Tim Rentsch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||txr at alumni dot caltech.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
--- Comment #10 from Tim Rentsch ---
I would like to add a few comments to the discussion.
One: C and C++ are different in how they treat unions. My comments
here are about C. I believe they apply to C++ as well, but I am not
as familiar with
