https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117423
--- Comment #5 from John Hodge ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Obvbious workaround `-fno-tree-sra` .
Thanks for pointing out the flag to avoid this issue, that's allowed me to
progress with my other testing. And thanks very mu
: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tpg+gcc at mutabah dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 59524
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59524&action=edit
Preprocessed output of reproduction (2-20241102-TimeCodegen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105860
--- Comment #2 from John Hodge ---
Created attachment 53144
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53144&action=edit
Reproduction, partially minimised and including assertion
Attached is an updated reproduction, that includes asse
Component: analyzer
Assignee: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tpg+gcc at mutabah dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 53092
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53092&action=edit
Reproduction source file, compile with `gcc -O1`
Found while de
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tpg+gcc at mutabah dot net
Target Milestone: ---
The following code compiles with g++ 9.2.0, but calls `Foo`'s destructor twice.
```
#include
struct Foo
{
