[Bug target/118284] [RISCV] No compressed c.j for offsets of -2044, -2046, -2048

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118284 --- Comment #2 from Tommy Murphy --- Hi Andrew - oh - sorry for logging it in the wrong place and thanks for the clarification. I'll log it against Binutils/as. Thanks again. Tommy.

[Bug c/118284] New: [RISCV] No compressed c.j for offsets of -2044, -2046, -2048

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118284 Bug ID: 118284 Summary: [RISCV] No compressed c.j for offsets of -2044, -2046, -2048 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/116054] RISCV: RV32: prologue/epilogue degradation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116054 Tommy Murphy changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tommy_murphy at hotmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug target/111065] [RISCV] t-linux-multilib specifies incorrect multilib reuse patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111065 --- Comment #7 from Tommy Murphy --- (In reply to palmer from comment #3) > The Linux and ELF multilibs are different: for Linux we assumed ISA > compatibility was up to the distro, so multilib just handles the ABI side of > things. That said,

[Bug target/111065] [RISCV] t-linux-multilib specifies incorrect multilib reuse patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111065 --- Comment #6 from Tommy Murphy --- Hi Kito/Palmer - should I maybe close this issue here and take it up in the riscv-gnu-toolchain/riscv-gcc repos instead? * https://github.com/riscv-collab/riscv-gnu-toolchain * https://github.com/riscv-coll

[Bug target/111065] [RISCV] t-linux-multilib specifies incorrect multilib reuse patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111065 --- Comment #5 from Tommy Murphy --- Thanks for the comments Palmer and Kito. However I'm still a bit confused. Is it the case that the multilib patterns (for the "base" lib and reuse patterns) are interpreted/used differently in the context of

[Bug target/111065] [RISCV] t-linux-multilib specifies incorrect multilib reuse patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111065 --- Comment #2 from Tommy Murphy --- Thanks @Kito Cheng - but I don't really understand how your comment relates to the specific issue of the t-linux-multilib reuse "mappings" being incorrect (and possibly the reverse of what was originally inte

[Bug target/111065] New: [RISCV] t-linux-multilib specifies incorrect multilib reuse patterns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111065 Bug ID: 111065 Summary: [RISCV] t-linux-multilib specifies incorrect multilib reuse patterns Product: gcc Version: og13 (devel/omp/gcc-13) Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/64215] -Os misses an opportunity to merge two ret instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64215 --- Comment #4 from Tommy Murphy --- I meant to say that maybe the target needs to be widened/generalised beyond just "Target: x86_64-*-*"? As per my previous comment and link, the same issue has been observed with RISC-V and this comment a

[Bug target/64215] -Os misses an opportunity to merge two ret instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64215 Tommy Murphy changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tommy_murphy at hotmail dot com --- Comme