https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
--- Comment #24 from Tomasz Gajewski ---
Well, they certainly did not at that time, so I think the bug can be closed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
--- Comment #22 from Tomasz Gajewski ---
In comment #10 I've provided test patch to test case that exposed a problem
(and in comment #11 some fix to all those tests). Currently I can't check if it
applies cleanly and if errors occur. If you want
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
--- Comment #11 from Tomasz Gajewski ---
Created attachment 30474
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30474&action=edit
Patch that fixes all testcases added by me in previous patch to simple.cc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
--- Comment #10 from Tomasz Gajewski ---
Created attachment 30473
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30473&action=edit
Patch to pretty printers testsuite to expose some problems
This patch adds into the testsuite additional cases
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
--- Comment #9 from Tomasz Gajewski ---
Following patch seems to solve this problem although I don't like it very much.
I think whole get_basic_type function should be moved to the beginning of
printers.py.
And additionally I'm not sure if this c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53477
Tomasz Gajewski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tomga at wp dot pl
--- Comment #8 from
