[Bug fortran/87937] [8/9 Regression] LHS reallocation broken inside "select type"

2018-11-08 Thread tomastrnka at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937 --- Comment #4 from Tomáš Trnka --- Created attachment 44973 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44973&action=edit Original tree dump after removing the offending check

[Bug fortran/87937] [8/9 Regression] LHS reallocation broken inside "select type"

2018-11-08 Thread tomastrnka at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937 --- Comment #3 from Tomáš Trnka --- Created attachment 44972 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44972&action=edit Original tree dump from 8.2.1 20181011

[Bug fortran/87937] [8/9 Regression] LHS reallocation broken inside "select type"

2018-11-08 Thread tomastrnka at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87937 --- Comment #2 from Tomáš Trnka --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > > The code to allocate t%x is simply never generated. > > How do you see that? > > WORKSFORME on darwin. Weird, I wouldn't expect the frontend to behave i

[Bug fortran/87937] New: [8/9 Regression] LHS reallocation broken inside "select type"

2018-11-08 Thread tomastrnka at gmx dot com
ty: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tomastrnka at gmx dot com Target Milestone: --- The fix for pr85954 broke LHS reallocation inside "select type" blocks. The following program segfaults wit

[Bug fortran/86330] False positive warnings about uninitialized offset/lbound/ubound when allocating on assignment

2018-06-27 Thread tomastrnka at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86330 --- Comment #1 from Tomáš Trnka --- Looks like a duplicate of bug 85855.

[Bug fortran/86330] New: False positive warnings about uninitialized offset/lbound/ubound when allocating on assignment

2018-06-27 Thread tomastrnka at gmx dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: tomastrnka at gmx dot com Target Milestone: --- The following testcase generates false positive warnings because "x" is unallocated before