https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91394
tomas_paukrt at conel dot cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tomas_paukrt at conel dot cz
Target Milestone: ---
Some C++ programs cross-compiled with GCC 7.4.0 using -std=gnu++11 do not work
on a system which have glibc 2.25 cross-compiled with GCC 4.9.4 even if the
symbol _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81142
--- Comment #12 from tomas_paukrt at conel dot cz ---
Hi Herald,
have you tried to cross-compile the library with -mtls-dialect=gnu2 ? We are
using this option as a workaround for this bug because no one seems to be
interested in fixing it. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81142
--- Comment #10 from tomas_paukrt at conel dot cz ---
> What happens if you use -fPIE since that is designed to create executables
> that are position independent and would do the right thing as far as various
> initializations go ?
It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81142
--- Comment #8 from tomas_paukrt at conel dot cz ---
Conditions for reproducing the bug:
- ARM architecture
- O1 or better optimalization
- TLS model global-dynamic or local-dynamic
- TLS dialect gnu
- at least two static thread local variables
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81142
--- Comment #7 from tomas_paukrt at conel dot cz ---
I attached another C source file that is even simpler.
Compiled program causes segmentation fault on AM335X (Cortex-A8) as well as on
SPEAr320S-2 (ARM926EJ-S).
Using option -ftls-model
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81142
--- Comment #6 from tomas_paukrt at conel dot cz ---
Created attachment 41595
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41595&action=edit
C source file without snprintf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81142
tomas_paukrt at conel dot cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.9.4, 5.4.0, 6.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81142
--- Comment #2 from tomas_paukrt at conel dot cz ---
Created attachment 41593
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41593&action=edit
Output of gcc -v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81142
--- Comment #1 from tomas_paukrt at conel dot cz ---
Created attachment 41592
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41592&action=edit
Preprocessed source file
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tomas_paukrt at conel dot cz
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41591
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41591&action=edit
C source file
If the attached C sour
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80627
--- Comment #4 from tomas_paukrt at conel dot cz ---
I wanted to trace this issue down to the root cause, but the Dart is quite
large project and I realy do not have time to isolate the code that triggers
this bug and fix it myself, so I just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80627
tomas_paukrt at conel dot cz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tomas_paukrt at conel dot cz
Target Milestone: ---
I have found out that the Dart (https://www.dartlang.org/) is occasionally
crashing when glibc 2.25 is cross-compiled with options
14 matches
Mail list logo
