[Bug middle-end/42103] [4.4 regression] packed 64-bit field reports as violation of strict aliasing rules

2009-11-21 Thread tlesher at digium dot com
--- Comment #4 from tlesher at digium dot com 2009-11-21 14:05 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > I've also confirmed that using the 'may_alias' attribute in the 64-bit > > version > > suppresses the warning, although I

[Bug middle-end/42103] [4.4 regression] packed 64-bit field reports as violation of strict aliasing rules

2009-11-20 Thread tlesher at digium dot com
--- Comment #2 from tlesher at digium dot com 2009-11-20 21:44 --- Created an attachment (id=19069) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19069&action=view) Two files that each use one of either the 32-bit or 64-bit versions of the function Each file in this att

[Bug c/42103] New: [4.4 regression] packed 64-bit field reports as violation of strict aliasing rules

2009-11-18 Thread tlesher at digium dot com
ent: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tlesher at digium dot com GCC host triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42103