[Bug fortran/100818] A temporary is passed to associated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100818 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/93563] Wrong code makes the compiler hang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93563 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/119669] [15 Regression] ICE in compare_parameter since r15-7449

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119669 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/119669] [15 Regression] ICE in compare_parameter since r15-7449

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119669 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/119669] [15 Regression] ICE in compare_parameter since r15-7449

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119669 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 61066 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61066&action=edit Patch which sets the function attribute This should fix the issue. I am actually not quite sure if the new er

[Bug fortran/119669] [15 Regression] ICE in compare_parameter since r15-7449

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119669 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/115983] ICE on valid code in gfc_is_nodesc_array, at fortran/trans-types.cc:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115983 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/119419] C prototype generation for functions returning C_FUNPTR incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119419 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/119419] C prototype generation for functions returning C_FUNPTR incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119419 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug cobol/119211] [15 Regression] Cobol GCC 15 release checklist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #5) > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #4) > > Added PR 119308, "Hello World" does not work on Power. > > I don't consider that a release blocker, personally, as i

[Bug cobol/119211] [15 Regression] Cobol GCC 15 release checklist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119211 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||119308 CC|

[Bug cobol/119308] New: Cobol ICE on "hello world" on POWER in rs6000_output_function_epilogue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119308 Bug ID: 119308 Summary: Cobol ICE on "hello world" on POWER in rs6000_output_function_epilogue Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/119078] Abstract bind(c) interface should not be a global entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119078 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/119078] Abstract bind(c) interface should not be a global entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119078 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- And a dummy argument should not be global, either.

[Bug fortran/119078] Abstract bind(c) interface should not be a global entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119078 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-03-08 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/119136] Printing result of function that prints itself hangs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119136 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/119074] Mismatched arguments for external dummy argument not caught

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119074 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/119157] [15 Regression] ice in gfc_enforce_clean_symbol_state, at fortran/symbol.cc:4459

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119157 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/119049] Procedures are mishandled in -fc-prototypes-external

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119049 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/119157] [15 Regression] ice in gfc_enforce_clean_symbol_state, at fortran/symbol.cc:4459

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119157 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/119157] [15 Regression] ice in gfc_enforce_clean_symbol_state, at fortran/symbol.cc:4459

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119157 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ice in |[15 Regression] ice in

[Bug fortran/119157] ice in gfc_enforce_clean_symbol_state, at fortran/symbol.cc:4459

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119157 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- Reduced test case: MODULE lmdif_module CONTAINS SUBROUTINE fdjac2 (fcn, m, n, x, fvec, fjac, ldfjac, iflag, & epsfcn, wa) END SUBROUTINE fdjac2 SUBROUTINE lmdif (fcn, m, n,

[Bug fortran/119074] Mismatched arguments for external dummy argument not caught

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119074 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- Maybe a warning is in order (under control of a suitable variable).

[Bug fortran/119074] Mismatched arguments for external dummy argument not caught

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119074 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #1) > Hmm... an interesting question: > > Does > > subroutine foo(f,n) > external f > if (n .eq. 1) call f(1) > if (n .eq. 2) call f(1,2) > end > > comply? A

[Bug fortran/119074] Mismatched arguments for external dummy argument not caught

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119074 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-stdcheck --- Comment #1 from Thom

[Bug fortran/119074] Mismatched arguments for external dummy argument not caught

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119074 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/119078] Abstract bind(c) interface should not be a global entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119078 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, needs-stdcheck --- Comment

[Bug fortran/119078] New: Abstract bind(c) interface should not be a global entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119078 Bug ID: 119078 Summary: Abstract bind(c) interface should not be a global entity Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug fortran/119074] New: Mismatched arguments for external dummy argument not caught

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119074 Bug ID: 119074 Summary: Mismatched arguments for external dummy argument not caught Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug fortran/119049] Procedures are mishandled in -fc-prototypes-external

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119049 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug fortran/119049] New: Procedures are mishandled in -fc-prototypes-external

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119049 Bug ID: 119049 Summary: Procedures are mishandled in -fc-prototypes-external Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug fortran/102368] Failure to compile program using the C_SIZEOF function in ISO_C_BINDING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102368 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #12) > So what now? > > Ask J3 for an opinion? Why not?

[Bug fortran/102368] Failure to compile program using the C_SIZEOF function in ISO_C_BINDING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102368 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #7) > (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #6) > > I think the code is valid. > > > > A named scalar Fortran variable is interoperable if and only if its type and > > typ

[Bug fortran/102368] Failure to compile program using the C_SIZEOF function in ISO_C_BINDING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102368 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Keywords|needs-stdcheck

[Bug fortran/115781] Error with passing array of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115781 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- ... or rather, the calculation needs to be done with the contents of x->_data and not with x directly.

[Bug fortran/115781] Error with passing array of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115781 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #6) After looking at the tree dump and some debugging, it is clear that the error happens on the callee side. If the callee has a type as dummy argument, it has

[Bug fortran/109322] -fc-prototypes does not correctly translate INTEGER(KIND=C_SIZE_T), and other sizes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109322 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig

[Bug fortran/118932] Testcase gfortran.dg/binding_label_tests_34.f90 needs standard checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118932 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- The discussion on the J3 mailing list seems to indicate that this is actually invalid, but nobody else catches it (and the restriction is also silly). Maybe we should just downgrade the error to a warning.

[Bug fortran/118932] Testcase gfortran.dg/binding_label_tests_34.f90 needs standard checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118932 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- Hm, maybe I am misunderstanding the standard here, or it says something that was not intentional... We accept program memain interface subroutine lower () bind(c,name="foo") end subroutine lowe

[Bug libfortran/118935] Segmentation fault in 'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90' when compiling libgfortran with '-O0'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118935 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org Ever conf

[Bug fortran/118955] Fortran uses vector math functions without -ffast-math

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118955 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig --- > Since vector > functions can have much larger ULP errors, using them by default with -O2 > seems excessive. "can have"? Is this indeed the case? I would consider this to be a bug in the implementation of

[Bug libfortran/118935] Segmentation fault in 'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90' when compiling libgfortran with '-O0'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118935 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig --- What does the OpenMP standard say about I/O in partallel exexution?

[Bug fortran/118932] Testcase gfortran.dg/binding_label_tests_34.f90 needs standard checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118932 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/118935] Segmentation fault in 'libgomp.fortran/rwlock_1.f90' when compiling libgfortran with '-O0'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118935 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/115781] Error with passing array of derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115781 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- This bug depends on the dummy argument being a class. Here's a somewhat shortened version: program simple implicit none type :: matrix integer :: nRows end type matrix type(matrix),dimension

[Bug fortran/32630] [meta-bug] ISO C binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32630 Bug 32630 depends on bug 113997, which changed state. Bug 113997 Summary: Bogus 'Warning: Interface mismatch in global procedure' with C binding https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113997 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/113997] Bogus 'Warning: Interface mismatch in global procedure' with C binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113997 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/107659] C procedure with no global scope is seen as global

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107659 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Ke

[Bug fortran/109322] -fc-prototypes does not correctly translate INTEGER(KIND=C_SIZE_T), and other sizes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109322 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig --- One additional point. Using -fdump-fortran-original on the original test case, one finds symtree: 'Bar' || symbol: 'bar' type spec : (UNKNOWN 0 C_INTEROP) attributes: (DERIVED P

[Bug libfortran/116400] [15 Regression] Regenerated files are no longer written to the source directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116400 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Is that with --enable-maintainer-mode? Yes (they would not be written out otherwise).

[Bug fortran/84386] Implicitly declared variables in BLOCK have scope of including program unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84386 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to kargls from comment #3) > Perhaps, you have a local change in your git repository. I just compiled the wrong test case, that's all :-)

[Bug tree-optimization/118896] The fortran compiler is unable to devirtualize typebound indirect calls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118896 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement CC|

[Bug fortran/58786] module function with passed character array of explicit length causes an ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58786 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Known to

[Bug fortran/84386] Implicitly declared variables in BLOCK have scope of including program unit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84386 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/86679] invalid code involving TARGET attribute is not rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86679 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2018-07-27 00:00:00 |2025-2-17 CC|

[Bug fortran/66182] Unneeded temporary for elemental functions of function results

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66182 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-08-30 00:00:00 |2025-2-17 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koe

[Bug fortran/47486] gfortran -M exits with fatal error when -o option is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47486 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2012-02-14 00:00:00 |2025-2-17 CC|

[Bug fortran/45057] Unneeded temporary / missed bounds violation for PACK

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45057 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2010-08-06 21:21:08 |2025-2-17 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Koe

[Bug fortran/113997] Bogus 'Warning: Interface mismatch in global procedure' with C binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113997 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-stdcheck --- Comment #9 from Thom

[Bug fortran/113997] Bogus 'Warning: Interface mismatch in global procedure' with C binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113997 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-stdcheck | --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---

[Bug fortran/113997] Bogus 'Warning: Interface mismatch in global procedure' with C binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113997 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-stdcheck --- Comment #7 from Thom

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 118862, which changed state. Bug 118862 Summary: UBSAN: shift exponent too large since r15-7345-gc2a0ee58865c5a https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118862 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/118862] UBSAN: shift exponent too large since r15-7345-gc2a0ee58865c5a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118862 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88052] Format contravening constraint C1002 permitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to john.harper from comment #14) > The comma between A and F is still required by F2023 constraint C1302, > and gfortran 14.2.0 still compiles and runs the test program omitting it > even if the -s

[Bug fortran/113997] Bogus 'Warning: Interface mismatch in global procedure' with C binding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113997 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/107266] Reject kind=4 characters for BIND(C) – it invalid and generates wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107266 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/104100] Passing an allocated array to a C bind function alters the bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104100 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/100916] Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100916 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-stdcheck Blocks|

[Bug fortran/84591] Compiling gfortran.dg/bind_c_usage_10.f03 with -fdefault-integer-8 gives errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84591 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org B

[Bug fortran/105310] ICE when UNION is after the 8th field in a DEC STRUCTURE with -finit-derived -finit-local-zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105310 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/88688] Incorrect association in SELECT TYPE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88688 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Resol

[Bug fortran/55978] class_optional_2.f90 -Os fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55978 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #36 from Thomas Koen

[Bug fortran/109624] dump-parse-tree prints attributes with unbalanced braces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109624 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/116829] Missing default initialization of finalizable non-polymorphic intent(out) arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116829 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/48958] Add runtime diagnostics for SIZE intrinsic function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48958 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/31059] bounds-check does not detect nonconforming assignment arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31059 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #13 from Thomas Koen

[Bug fortran/88052] Format contravening constraint C1002 permitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/88052] Format contravening constraint C1002 permitted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88052 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug fortran/113883] allocatable length parameter used but is undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113883 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/118862] UBSAN: shift exponent too large since r15-7345-gc2a0ee58865c5a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118862 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- Created attachment 60505 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60505&action=edit Patch that should fix the issue I think the attached patch, based on Jakub's patch, should fix the issue. I t

[Bug target/118890] usbsan failure for powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118890 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||63426 Target|

[Bug target/118890] New: usbsan failure for powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118890 Bug ID: 118890 Summary: usbsan failure for powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/118159] link from Fortran documentation, coco is now an online casino

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118159 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/118845] [15 regression] ICE when building lapack-3.12.0 on x86 (compare_parameter, at fortran/interface.cc:2521)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118845 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig --- Fixed with r15-7552-gfd00010ba21c04bddb20aef52f62de5636075067 .

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #8) > Hmm.. .the type should not be BT_UNKNOWN. > > Reduced test caes: > > SUBROUTINE CGET24 > EXTERNAL CSLECT > LOGOCAL CSLECT > > CALL CGE

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- Hmm.. .the type should not be BT_UNKNOWN. Reduced test caes: SUBROUTINE CGET24 EXTERNAL CSLECT LOGOCAL CSLECT CALL CGEESX(CSLECT) IF (CSLECT() KNTEIG = KNTEIG + 1 CALL

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/118884] [15 regression] lapack fails to compile (Error: Type mismatch at (1) passing global function ‘cslect’ declared at (2) (UNKNOWN/LOGICAL(4)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118884 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #6) > I forgot to mention this is a good hint for Thomas regarding how to tweak > the previous fix. Yes, if the argument is of unknown type, the test can be skipped,

[Bug fortran/118862] UBSAN: shift exponent too large since r15-7345-gc2a0ee58865c5a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118862 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- > I'll take a look. Found it, will probably submit tomorrow.

[Bug fortran/118862] UBSAN: shift exponent too large since r15-7345-gc2a0ee58865c5a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118862 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Completely untested. This regresses in unsigned_43.f90, on the test case unsigned(kind=1) :: x, r1, r2, r3, r4 unsigned(kind=1) :: n x = 0u_1

[Bug fortran/118862] UBSAN: shift exponent too large since r15-7345-gc2a0ee58865c5a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118862 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/118845] [15 regression] ICE when building lapack-3.12.0 on x86 (compare_parameter, at fortran/interface.cc:2521)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118845 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig --- Should be fixed by https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cdb4d27a4c2786cf1b1b0eb1872eac6a5f931578 (I'll wait for closing this until it is confirmed that Lapack builds again).

[Bug fortran/118845] [15 regression] ICE when building lapack-3.12.0 on x86 (compare_parameter, at fortran/interface.cc:2521)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118845 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig --- This works: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/interface.cc b/gcc/fortran/interface.cc index fdde84db80d..eee5520ad93 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/interface.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/interface.cc @@ -5822,7 +5822,14 @@ gfc_ge

[Bug fortran/118845] [15 regression] ICE when building lapack-3.12.0 on x86 (compare_parameter, at fortran/interface.cc:2521)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118845 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/96909] ICE with nested polymorphic allocatable component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96909 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING

[Bug fortran/97123] double free detected in tcache 2 with recursive allocatable type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97123 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconf

[Bug fortran/96909] ICE with nested polymorphic allocatable component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96909 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug fortran/96909] ICE with nested polymorphic allocatable component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96909 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code CC|

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >