--- Comment #11 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-09-06 21:13 ---
Subject: Re: Wrong code for SPREAD on zero-sized
arrays
Hi Toon,
>
> --- Comment #8 from toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2007-09-06
> 08:56 ---
> Wouldn't it be an opti
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-08-01 17:46 ---
Subject: Re: mask and -fdefault-integer-8
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 15:36 +, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr wrote:
>
> --- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-08-01 15:36
> ---
>
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-05-29 17:47 ---
Subject: Re: knowing that stride==1 when using
allocated arrays and escaping allocatable arrays
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 04:52 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> we think we change a'
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-03-31 08:11 ---
Subject: Re: Last record truncated for read after short
write, direct access file
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 00:45 +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
> Michael sent me this excellent test c
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-03-24 23:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=13280)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13280&action=view)
proposed patch
This one also fixes the last case.
It does so by reading size bytes instead of the kind
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-03-24 22:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=13279)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13279&action=view)
patch for the test cases
All but one of these were errors in the test cases, which are
corrected with thi
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-03-24 22:17 ---
This is a bug in the test case.
I'll commit a correct version.
Thomas
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31297
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-03-24 21:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=13278)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13278&action=view)
proposed patch
This should fix it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31196
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-03-23 20:14 ---
The eoshift.f90 case is 'mostly harmless'. We are doing calculations
with the value, but don't actually use this for anything.
We can "fix" this (cosmetic fix for valgrind, really) by
