https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61769
--- Comment #8 from theemathas at hotmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> If you change it to:
>
> const int& aa = std::abs(a);
> const int& foo=std::max(aa, aa);
>
> You'll
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61769
--- Comment #5 from theemathas at hotmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33100
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33100&action=edit
"main.ii.gz" preprocessed and compressed code
Since the "main.ii&quo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61769
theemathas at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61769
theemathas at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61769
theemathas at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||theemathas at hotmail dot
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: theemathas at hotmail dot com
I previously thought that the g++ compiler should not contain bugs when
compiling valid code without using very strange tricks. However, the bug I
found can be
