http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60747
tech changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from tech ---
We have alread
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60747
--- Comment #3 from tech ---
Created attachment 32534
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32534&action=edit
Assembly of O2 WITH tree-vrp
Assembly of O2 WITH tree-vrp
.file"main.cpp"
.text
.p2align 4,,15
.globl _Z7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60747
--- Comment #2 from tech ---
Created attachment 32533
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32533&action=edit
Assembly of O2 no tree-vrp
Assembly of O2 no tree-vrp
.file"main.cpp"
.text
.p2align 4,,15
.globl _Z7hash
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: techsgin at gmail dot com
Hi
At optimization level O2 the results of return value of short if are miss
calculated i.e wrong results. see example
Solution:
Don't use the tree-vrp compilation flag i.e add -fno-tre
