http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53398
--- Comment #5 from Roman Wieczorek 2012-05-28
15:50:30 UTC ---
As it goes for Leaf classes (IA64 C++ ABI - Category 1: Leaf),
vtables are binary defined in com document (only virtual functions, no
constructor, no destructor, no overloades).
And
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53398
--- Comment #3 from Roman Wieczorek 2012-05-23
08:11:43 UTC ---
Just to clarify, the exact way msc places methods in vtable is:
Grouping the overloaded methods.
Placing them in reverted order in starting where first of those overload group
occur
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53398
--- Comment #2 from Roman Wieczorek 2012-05-21
10:18:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I think if we provide an option for this, we are
> going to have people abuse this.
The risk i see here is about compatibility of gcc compiled libraries w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53398
Bug #: 53398
Summary: feature request: option for overloaded methods order
in vtable compatibility with msc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
S
