https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #34 from Svante Signell ---
This is incredible. Now Debian forgot to add the spilt-stack patch for GNU/Hurd
for gcc-13 (1:20230315-1). But it shouldn't be needed, it should have been
upstreamed a long time ago. The patch is from Janu
: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: regression
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: svante.signell at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 52497
--> https://gcc.gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #26 from Svante Signell ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #25)
> > Hopefully someone knows hot to modify Makefile.tpl/Makefile.def to generate
> > the correct dependencies in Makefile.in.
>
> I suggest that you open a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #24 from Svante Signell ---
Thanks Ian,
Hopefully someone knows hot to modify Makefile.tpl/Makefile.def to generate the
correct dependencies in Makefile.in.
Another patch that is not applied: gcc_config_gnu.h.diff. Who will commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #20 from Svante Signell ---
Hi again,
Attached are patch #1 to patch #9 to make libgo.so.21.0.0 to build
successfully, from the source gcc-12-12-20220214.
I see that the first patch: "Adding hurd to unixsock_readmsg_cloexec.go" wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #19 from Svante Signell ---
Hi again,
Attached are patch #1 to patch #9 to make libgo.so.21.0.0 to build
successfully, from the source gcc-12-12-20220214.
I see that the first patch: "Adding hurd to unixsock_readmsg_cloexec.go" wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #18 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 52472
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52472&action=edit
patch #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #17 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 52471
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52471&action=edit
Patch #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #16 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 52470
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52470&action=edit
patch #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #15 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 52469
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52469&action=edit
patch #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #14 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 52468
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52468&action=edit
patch #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #13 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 52467
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52467&action=edit
patch #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #12 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 52466
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52466&action=edit
patch #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #11 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 52465
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52465&action=edit
pathch #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #10 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 52464
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52464&action=edit
patch #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #8 from Svante Signell ---
> If you make all-target-libgo all dependencies are respected.
Sorry but that is not how things work:
all-target-libgo: maybe-all-target-libffi
is outside any conditionals, but
all-target-libgo: maybe-all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #6 from Svante Signell ---
OK, forget about the gotools. The problem is that libgo is built _before_
libatomic and libbacktrace. A Debian error??
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #3 from Svante Signell ---
With the proposed patches everything builds fine. The only issue to resolve is
how to make sure libatomic and libbacktrace builds in build/i686-gnu before
libgo/gotools.
Any ideas? I'm not sure if this is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
--- Comment #2 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 52360
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52360&action=edit
Fix broken split-stack support for GNU/Hurd
Hello,
The attached patch defines OPTION_GLIBC_P and OPTION_GLIB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104290
Svante Signell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||svante.signell at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #11 from Svante Signell ---
ping?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #10 from Svante Signell ---
Hello,
The 6 attached patches are improving the build and tests of gccgo for Hurd.
Attachment 49931 is needed for libgo to build, while the other are improving
the tests of libgo,go and gotools. Attachment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #9 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 49935
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49935&action=edit
gcc-11 patches for libgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #8 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 49934
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49934&action=edit
gcc-11 patches for libgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #7 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 49933
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49933&action=edit
gcc-11 patches for libgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #6 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 49932
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49932&action=edit
gcc-11 patches for libgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #5 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 49931
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49931&action=edit
gcc-11 patches for libgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #4 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 49930
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49930&action=edit
gcc-11 patches for libgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
--- Comment #3 from Svante Signell ---
On Sat, 2021-01-02 at 17:49 +, doko at debian dot org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98496
>
> Matthias Klose changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98153
--- Comment #2 from Svante Signell ---
Hello,
Looking into the build failure of libgo for GNU/Hurd reveals that since AF_LINK
is not yet supported, the corresponding code for SockaddrDatalink stuff needs
to be stripped off socket_bsd.go, thereby
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98153
--- Comment #1 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 49702
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49702&action=edit
Build fix of libgo for GNU/Hurd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93900
--- Comment #4 from Svante Signell ---
Sorry, but there were two patches attached:
one for
libgo/go/internal/syscall/unix/nonblocking.go
and one for
libgo/go/internal/poll/fcntl_syscall.go
>From the commit https://gcc.gnu.org/g:027a3f1c38727a1ea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93900
--- Comment #1 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 47895
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47895&action=edit
Add hurd to // +build
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: svante.signell at gmail dot com
CC: cmang at google dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47894
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47894&action=edit
Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93468
--- Comment #3 from Svante Signell ---
ping!
These patches are very minor. What takes so long time? They were reported for
gcc-10, I did not find any entry for gcc-snapshot. Is gcc-10 released and
stable, compared to gcc-snapshot, i.e. current m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93468
--- Comment #2 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 47720
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47720&action=edit
Add hurd to // +build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93468
--- Comment #1 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 47719
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47719&action=edit
Add hurd to // +build
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: svante.signell at gmail dot com
CC: cmang at google dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47718
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47718&action=edit
netpoll_hurd.go update
Fixes FTBFS
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: svante.signell at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47542
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47542&action=edit
fix for glimits.h
Hello,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93020
--- Comment #1 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 47530
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47530&action=edit
Fixes libgo os test.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93020
--- Comment #2 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 47531
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47531&action=edit
Fixes libgo syscall test
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: svante.signell at gmail dot com
CC: cmang at google dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 47529
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47529&action=edit
Fixes FTBFS for gcc-10 on GNU/Hurd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84817
Svante Signell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84817
Svante Signell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|PR tree-optimization/84526: |gcc-8-8-20180310-1 FTBFS on
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: svante.signell at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi,
Latest Debian version of gcc-8: gcc-8-8-20180310-1 (r258410) FTBFS due
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63448
--- Comment #5 from Svante Signell ---
FYI: atlas builds fine with gcc-4.8.3-11 (and gfortran-4.9-15)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63448
--- Comment #2 from Svante Signell ---
Hi, when compiling ./build/atlas-base/src/blas/gemm/KERNEL/ATL_cNCCUmmNN.c from
Debian atlas 3.10.2-3 on GNU/Hurd the ICE happens (twice):
ATL_cNCCUmmNN.c:3856:1: internal compiler error: Maximum number of L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63448
--- Comment #1 from Svante Signell ---
Created attachment 33642
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33642&action=edit
Preprocessed source stored into /tmp/ccejGHdk.out file
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: svante.signell at gmail dot com
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: svante.signell at gmail dot com
Created attachment 32384
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32384&action=edit
Use WCONTINUED as third argument to waitpid only if defined
Hi,
Currently gcc-4.9 (20140218-1 20140303-1) and fails t
50 matches
Mail list logo
