[Bug c/104011] New: s390: r12 is not setup for _mcount call

2022-01-13 Thread stli at linux dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104011 Bug ID: 104011 Summary: s390: r12 is not setup for _mcount call Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/99134] S390x: pfpo instructions are not used for dfp[128|64|32] to/from long double conversions

2021-02-22 Thread stli at linux dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99134 stli at linux dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNC

[Bug c/99134] New: S390x: pfpo instructions are not used for dfp[128|64|32] to/from long double conversions

2021-02-17 Thread stli at linux dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99134 Bug ID: 99134 Summary: S390x: pfpo instructions are not used for dfp[128|64|32] to/from long double conversions Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug c/98269] gcc 6.5.0 __builtin_add_overflow() with small uint32_t values incorrectly detects overflow

2020-12-17 Thread stli at linux dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98269 --- Comment #5 from stli at linux dot ibm.com --- Just as information, I've just committed this glibc patch: "s390x: Require GCC 7.1 or later to build glibc." https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=844b4d8b4b937fe6943d2c0c80ce7d871cdb

[Bug c/98269] gcc 6.5.0 __builtin_add_overflow() with small uint32_t values incorrectly detects overflow

2020-12-14 Thread stli at linux dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98269 stli at linux dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||s390x Known to work|

[Bug c/98269] New: gcc 6.5.0 __builtin_add_overflow() with small uint32_t values incorrectly detects overflow

2020-12-14 Thread stli at linux dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98269 Bug ID: 98269 Summary: gcc 6.5.0 __builtin_add_overflow() with small uint32_t values incorrectly detects overflow Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/98070] [11 Regression] errno is not re-evaluated after clearing errno and calling realloc(ptr, SIZE_MAX)

2020-12-01 Thread stli at linux dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98070 --- Comment #5 from stli at linux dot ibm.com --- I've just build and run the attached test on s390x/x86_64 with your fix. Now errno is re-evaluated after realloc. I've also rebuild glibc on s390x and the original glibc-test /malloc/tst-malloc-t

[Bug c/98070] New: errno is not re-evaluated after clearing errno and calling realloc(ptr, SIZE_MAX)

2020-11-30 Thread stli at linux dot ibm.com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98070 Bug ID: 98070 Summary: errno is not re-evaluated after clearing errno and calling realloc(ptr, SIZE_MAX) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever