[Bug c++/96117] Cannot mix c++11-style and GCC-style attributes on struct in one specific location

2023-06-23 Thread steveire at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96117 Stephen changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/108499] False positive -Warray-bounds

2023-01-24 Thread steveire at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108499 --- Comment #3 from Stephen --- False positives with this will just lead to proliferation of -Wno-array-bounds, which doesn't help.

[Bug tree-optimization/108499] False positive -Warray-bounds

2023-01-24 Thread steveire at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108499 --- Comment #2 from Stephen --- > There is no way to figure out for the compiler that theSize is not zero > either. There is no way for the compiler to figure out that theSize *is* zero. We have warnings -Wmaybe-uninitialized and -Wuninitiali

[Bug c++/108499] New: False positive -Warray-bounds

2023-01-23 Thread steveire at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108499 Bug ID: 108499 Summary: False positive -Warray-bounds Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assi

[Bug c++/108416] New: False positive -Wdangling-pointer

2023-01-16 Thread steveire at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108416 Bug ID: 108416 Summary: False positive -Wdangling-pointer Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/108385] New: false positive -Wfree-nonheap-object

2023-01-12 Thread steveire at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108385 Bug ID: 108385 Summary: false positive -Wfree-nonheap-object Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/108197] [12/13 Regression] -Wstringop-overread emitted on simple boost small_vector code

2022-12-24 Thread steveire at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108197 --- Comment #2 from Stephen --- Richard, are you saying this a bug in the boost code? It's not quite clear to me from your message. Can you be more specific about what the bug is in that case?

[Bug c++/108197] New: -Wstringop-overread emitted on simple boost small_vector code

2022-12-22 Thread steveire at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108197 Bug ID: 108197 Summary: -Wstringop-overread emitted on simple boost small_vector code Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/105968] New: GCC vectorizes but reports that it did not vectorize

2022-06-14 Thread steveire at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105968 Bug ID: 105968 Summary: GCC vectorizes but reports that it did not vectorize Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon