[Bug fortran/38404] Warning message identifies incorrect line

2010-05-13 Thread steve dot chapel at a2pg dot com
--- Comment #4 from steve dot chapel at a2pg dot com 2010-05-13 16:28 --- :) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38404

[Bug fortran/38404] Warning message identifies incorrect line

2010-05-13 Thread steve dot chapel at a2pg dot com
--- Comment #2 from steve dot chapel at a2pg dot com 2010-05-13 13:15 --- Excellent! The new warning is far more understandable than the old. X'"R" IN CALL RANDOM MAY NOT BE USED OUTSIDE THE BLOCK CONTAINING T 1 Warning: Initialization string starting at (1

[Bug fortran/38404] New: Warning message identifies incorrect line

2008-12-04 Thread steve dot chapel at a2pg dot com
cc Version: 4.3.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: steve dot chapel at a2pg dot com GCC build triplet: i386-redhat-linux GCC host triplet: i3

[Bug libfortran/32784] [win32] Using 'CONOUT$', 'CONIN$', or 'CONERR$' as assigned file generates Fortran runtime error: Bad file descriptor

2008-11-18 Thread steve dot chapel at a2pg dot com
--- Comment #30 from steve dot chapel at a2pg dot com 2008-11-18 12:59 --- Although bug 38122 causes NONMEM to not run as is, all it takes is a simple one-line change to get it to run normally on Linux. This bug, on the other hand, makes it effectively impossible to run NONMEM

[Bug libfortran/32784] [win32] Using 'CONOUT$', 'CONIN$', or 'CONERR$' as assigned file generates Fortran runtime error: Bad file descriptor

2008-11-17 Thread steve dot chapel at a2pg dot com
--- Comment #28 from steve dot chapel at a2pg dot com 2008-11-17 15:01 --- I'm changing the summary of this bug report to better indicate the problem that the patch fixes. Could we get the patch into gfortran 4.5? There is discussion on the NONMEM users mailing list about how t

[Bug fortran/38122] "file already opened in another unit" error when opening /dev/null or /dev/tty twice

2008-11-14 Thread steve dot chapel at a2pg dot com
--- Comment #2 from steve dot chapel at a2pg dot com 2008-11-14 20:19 --- It's not a bug in my program. It's a bug in NONMEM VI. That is, assuming that /dev/tty and /dev/null are files, which they're not. They're devices. Regardless, it's code that runs in an o