https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116620
--- Comment #5 from Stephane ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> I am 99% sure we don't want to have this implemented. There has been other
> requests about this before but I can't find them.
I'm receptive to reasoned arguments, b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116620
--- Comment #4 from Stephane ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2008-July/178284.html
This is indeed the prior mentions I found and the only objection I read in the
thread was in https://gcc.gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116620
Bug ID: 116620
Summary: Feature request: type attribute to control storage
size of pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114046
Bug ID: 114046
Summary: Aarch64: Os,O1,02,O3 optimisations generates unaligned
access in short members of structure
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED