[Bug other/78766] New: GCC Awk scripts use the non-POSIX /^{/ regex

2016-12-10 Thread sstewartgallus00 at mylangara dot bc.ca
: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sstewartgallus00 at mylangara dot bc.ca Target Milestone: --- When building with the latest Gawk 4.14 and POSIXLY_CORRECT set I get the error gawk: /home/sstewartgallus/root/var/src/gcc-6.2.0/gcc/opt-functions.awk:64

[Bug other/68712] The PHDR part of ELF binaries are executable

2015-12-05 Thread sstewartgallus00 at mylangara dot bc.ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68712 Steven Stewart-Gallus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED Resolution|MOVED

[Bug other/68712] New: The PHDR part of ELF binaries are executable

2015-12-04 Thread sstewartgallus00 at mylangara dot bc.ca
: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sstewartgallus00 at mylangara dot bc.ca Target Milestone: --- When I create binaries using GCC I obtain binaries that needlessly have the executable bit set for PHDR part of the program.

[Bug middle-end/63338] Compiling large amounts of large switch cases takes a large amount of time

2014-09-23 Thread sstewartgallus00 at mylangara dot bc.ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63338 --- Comment #4 from Steven Stewart-Gallus --- > What version of GCC and on which target? Right, I should have mentioned that earlier. > $ uname -a > Linux alonzo 3.13.0-34-generic #1trisquel1 SMP Sun Aug 24 04:17:04 UTC 2014 > x86_64 x86_64 x

[Bug c/63338] Compiling large amounts of large switch cases takes a large amount of time

2014-09-22 Thread sstewartgallus00 at mylangara dot bc.ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63338 --- Comment #1 from Steven Stewart-Gallus --- Created attachment 33535 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33535&action=edit Preprocessed source code

[Bug c/63338] New: Compiling large amounts of large switch cases takes a large amount of time

2014-09-22 Thread sstewartgallus00 at mylangara dot bc.ca
: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sstewartgallus00 at mylangara dot bc.ca Compiling a large amount of large switch cases takes a really large amount of time. In the attached code I did two things which caused and

[Bug c/61985] New: It's possible to declare a function pointer as noreturn using the old volatile syntax but not normally.

2014-07-31 Thread sstewartgallus00 at mylangara dot bc.ca
known Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sstewartgallus00 at mylangara dot bc.ca It's against the C11 standard to let people use the _Noreturn keyword on