https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69585
David Seifert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||soap at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #8 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108022
David Seifert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||soap at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104855
--- Comment #2 from David Seifert ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I think the code is definitely "bad style", it seems A lacks a CTOR from
> 'unsigned' and the code tries to workaround this issue.
>
> Not sure whether these k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104855
Bug ID: 104855
Summary: -Wclass-memaccess is too broad with valid code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97566
David Seifert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||soap at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #7 fr