https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80931
--- Comment #7 from snowfed ---
Wow! Read your book with great pleasure! (the Russian translation of it)
(In reply to Arjen Markus from comment #6)
> Yes, I am :).
>
> Regards,
>
> Arjen
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80931
--- Comment #5 from snowfed ---
If you don't mind my asking, are you the Fortran book author Arjen Markus?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80931
snowfed changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||snowfed at mail dot ru
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80291
--- Comment #7 from snowfed ---
In the slightly reduced version of the test case cell is not allocated when
reaching associate structure. Maybe, allocate(cell) is worth being added. For
example, when I compile the example with ifort and run it I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80291
--- Comment #4 from snowfed ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> r163260 rejected it:
> Error: Incompatible ranks 0 and 1 in assignment at (1)
> and r163270 already ICEs like everything later.
> In that range only r163263 mentions gf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80291
--- Comment #2 from snowfed ---
Created attachment 41109
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41109&action=edit
This small program reproduces the compiler bug (SIMPLIFIED).
This new test program is much more simple than the previ
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: snowfed at mail dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41108
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41108&action=edit
This small
