--- Comment #1 from sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl 2009-05-26 11:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=17918)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17918&action=view)
Divonne_preprocessed.c
Compiler input that causes the internal error.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl
GCC build triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux
GCC host triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux
GCC target tripl
--- Comment #7 from sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl 2009-05-18 14:52 ---
The case (a < b) && (b < a) shows that not discarding the extra precision
before performing a comparison leads to serious problems.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40186
--- Comment #21 from sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl 2009-03-18 13:25 ---
Yes, yes, using gcc has to be pain in the neck.
You are reluctant to fix an obvious mistake and instead of saying "sorry" are
keeping it broken.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38496
--- Comment #2 from sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl 2008-04-28 15:02 ---
OK, the LAPACK library was probably compiled with 4.1.2.
--
sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl 2008-04-28 14:47 ---
See
http://forums.amd.com/devforum/messageview.cfm?catid=217&threadid=90399&messid=881726&parentid=856116&FTVAR_FORUMVIEWTMP=Branch
for a similar complaint.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36072
symbols in gfortran
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl
GCC build tripl
--- Comment #3 from sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl 2007-08-06 12:41 ---
1. The attached d1mach.f works fine with g77.
2. The numbers are 32-bit, so why an overflow? Maybe the number is extended as
a signed number (padded with ones), and the conversion is unsigned.
--
http
--- Comment #4 from sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl 2007-08-06 12:45 ---
With -fno-range-check I get:
d1mach.f: In function 'd1mach':
d1mach.f:2: fatal error: gfc_todo: Not Implemented: Initialization of
overlapping variables
compilation terminated.
See also bug #33002.
--- Comment #3 from sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl 2007-08-06 11:21 ---
Now I see that 32-bit data is incorrect also.
DATA RMACH(1) / Z'0080' /
DATA RMACH(2) / Z'7F7F' /
DATA RMACH(3) / Z'3380' /
DATA RMACH(4) / Z'
--- Comment #2 from sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl 2007-08-06 11:18 ---
There is also bug #33001. Both the bugs together make life difficult.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33002
--- Comment #1 from sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl 2007-08-06 11:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=14029)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14029&action=view)
sample source that demonstrates the problem
This is a SLATEC machine file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
e incorrect data.
--
Summary: 64-bit hexadecimal DATA incorrect
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl 2007-08-06 11:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=14028)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14028&action=view)
sample source that does not compile
This is a SLATEC machine file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl
GCC build triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux
GCC host tr
--- Comment #98 from sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl 2007-08-03 12:09 ---
*** Bug 32976 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl 2007-08-03 12:09 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 323 ***
--
sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sliwa at cft dot edu dot pl
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32976
18 matches
Mail list logo