http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
--- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey 2011-12-19 18:33:07
UTC ---
Yes, this was failing on ia64 hpux as well as hppa hpux.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51144
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51144
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey 2011-11-16 00:43:15
UTC ---
I think this is a big-endian bug in fprint_whex, etc. IA64 HP-UX is
big endian and I think s390-ibm-linux is too.
||11.23
CC||jimis at gmx dot net, sje
||at cup dot hp.com
Host|s390-ibm-linux |s390-ibm-linux,ia64-hp-hpux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51032
--- Comment #10 from Steve Ellcey 2011-11-08 23:08:37
UTC ---
I did a successful bootstrap on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 with the patch. I am
still running the test suite.
,
|i386-pc-solaris2.11 |i386-pc-solaris2.11,
||hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
Host|alpha-dec-osf5.1b, |alpha-dec-osf5.1b,
|i386-pc-solaris2.11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
--- Comment #7 from Steve Ellcey 2011-10-25 19:53:31
UTC ---
Bootstrapping and testing both look good with the patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2011-10-21 20:55:47
UTC ---
forgot to mention that the test case needs to be compiled with -O2 -g to
reproduce the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey 2011-10-21 20:46:46
UTC ---
Created attachment 25573
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25573
small test case
Test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
Bug #: 50826
Summary: bootstrap on 64 bit pa broken by r180194, ICE in
mem_loc_descriptor
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
||sje at cup dot hp.com
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2011-10-20 21:31:53
UTC ---
Fixed by adding do-skip-if to the testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37678
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38018
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48823
--- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey 2011-10-13 20:16:46
UTC ---
I am not sure any set of flags will guarantee strict IEEE floating point
behavior. See PR37845 for some more information.
||sje at cup dot hp.com
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey 2011-10-13 17:57:50
UTC ---
The difference in results is due to the use of the fma instructions (fused
multiply add). If you don't want the fma instructions to be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Blocks|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50153
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50350
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49967
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9635
--- Comment #8 from Steve Ellcey 2011-09-27 18:23:56
UTC ---
No, the patch I mentioned was not sent to this project. If I am reading the
web site correctly (the first link in comment #6), I think the patch was sent
to the
apache version of the C+
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9635
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #6 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50153
--- Comment #9 from Steve Ellcey 2011-08-23 20:55:15
UTC ---
I think all I need to do is expand the existing hpux11_abs fixinclude rule
from 'ia64-hp-hpux11*' to '*-hp-hpux11*' I am currently testing this.
The other checks for '__cplusplus < 19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50153
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey 2011-08-22 23:31:20
UTC ---
I am testing an inclhack.def header file fixup for abs. I am not sure if any
of the other header files checks on __cplusplus will be a problem but fixing
the abs problem should get us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50153
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49967
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #1 from
||sje at cup dot hp.com
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey 2011-07-28 21:25:06
UTC ---
This is fixed now with this patch:
r176747 | ro | 2011-07-25 07:24
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49746
--- Comment #9 from Steve Ellcey 2011-07-15 16:03:16
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Using the 4.2.4 I had available, I got gcc-4.6.1 installed.
>
> Still doesn't pass perl build:
>
> CCCMD = gcc64 -DPERL_CORE -c -mpa-risc-2-0 -D
||net, sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2011-07-14 20:34:28
UTC ---
Are you trying to use a 32 bit GCC to bootstrap a 64 bit GCC? I see you have
CC set to gcc64 which makes me think that you are using a 64 bit GCC to do the
bootstrap but you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49454
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-21 16:26:44
UTC ---
I should have mentioned in comment #2 that the build and test I did included
the proposed patch in comment #11 pf PR 49429.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49454
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-21 15:48:14
UTC ---
I built an hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 compiler with --disable-bootstrap and then ran
the test suite to see if I could get a smaller test case. The tests are still
running but there are many
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #14 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-21 15:21:44
UTC ---
The bootstrap and testing of this patch on IA64 looks good. There were no
regressions and it seems to have fixed all the test cases that started breaking
on IA64 with the patch to PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #13 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-20 21:18:18
UTC ---
Yes, it fixed the test case on ia64-hp-hpux11.23. I will put it in my nightly
bootstrap and test setup and let you know the results of that tomorrow.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49443
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-20 17:12:41
UTC ---
Yes, the patch in comment #2 fixes the failures on IA64.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #10 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-17 20:49:22
UTC ---
With regards to the question in comment #9, you would probably do better asking
it on the gcc-patches mailing list then in the comment of this bug report since
more people would see it
||2011.06.17 18:30:10
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
Depends on||49429
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-17 18:30:10
UTC ---
This is caused by r175063
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49443
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-16 16:13:42
UTC ---
Created attachment 24547
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24547
Dump file with vectorize details
Dump file from vect-peel-3.c when run with
-ftree-vectorize -fno-ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49443
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-peel-3.c and vect-peel-4.c fail on
IA64 after testsuite change
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-15 22:39:26
UTC ---
Created attachment 24542
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24542
dse dump of x.c after change was made
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-15 22:38:15
UTC ---
Created attachment 24541
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24541
dse dump of x.c before change was made
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-15 22:37:24
UTC ---
Created attachment 24540
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24540
Cut down version of gcc.dg/struct-by-value-1.c
This is a cutdown version of gcc.dg/struct-by-value-1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
Summary: dse.c changes to fix PR44194 (r175063) cause execution
failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49414
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #7 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49349
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-13 19:29:56
UTC ---
I tested the patch from comment #1 and it fixed gfortran.dg/char_result_3.f90.
I got one regression on IA64 Linux but I can't reproduce it so I think it was
just a fluke. There were n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49349
Summary: gfortran.dg/char_result_3.f90 fails with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #12 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-08 20:07:04
UTC ---
Checking for a warning using check_no_compiler_messages seems as easy or easier
then checking the return code so I did that. I have submitted a patch to
gcc-patches.
http://gcc.gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #10 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-08 18:12:40
UTC ---
How about compiling this with -Wcast-align and looking for a warning message:
char *y;
typedef char __attribute__ ((__aligned__(__BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__))) c;
c *z;
void foo(void)
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #6 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #20 from Steve Ellcey 2011-05-06 23:04:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > The patch works for me on ia64-hp-hpux11.23. It fixed the four new
> > failures I
> > had and caused no regressions.
>
> Ste
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey 2011-05-03 22:15:38
UTC ---
The patch works for me on ia64-hp-hpux11.23. It fixed the four new failures I
had and caused no regressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey 2011-05-03 15:02:26
UTC ---
Yes, I am seeing some new failures on IA64 HP-UX. I do not get the stackalign
failures but I do get:
FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/static-local-var-in-ctor.C scan-assembler
DW_OP_addr[^
\
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2011-04-27 21:58:53
UTC ---
It looks like I was wrong about this showing up on IA64 Linux. I am only
seeing it on IA64 HP-UX and only in 32 bit mode. That probably means it is
related to the HP-UX pointer extens
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673
Summary: [4.7 Regression] GCC generates WAW and RAW conflicts
on IA64.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48629
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48629
Summary: ICE on gcc.dg/pr42389.c on ia64-*-* with
-fsched-pressure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
--- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey 2011-04-05 23:12:25
UTC ---
Bootstrap finished, everything looked good.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
--- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey 2011-04-05 21:20:09
UTC ---
The patch looks good. I haven't finished my bootstrap but I am in stage2 and
dbxout.c compiled correctly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469
--- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey 2011-04-05 20:43:47
UTC ---
I have submitted it as PR 48471.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey 2011-04-05 20:44:32
UTC ---
FYI: I could not find a changelog entry for the r171981 change to dbxout.c.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48471
Summary: ia64-*-* does not bootstrap due to unused variables in
dbxout.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #32
||2011.03.25 23:02:21
CC||richard.sandiford at linaro
||dot org, sje at cup dot
||hp.com
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |sje at gcc dot gnu.org
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
--- Comment #8 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-22 17:13:29
UTC ---
OK, that is what I was missing. I didn't notice there was a second test to
check for that, sorry for the confusion.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-22 16:59:03
UTC ---
I guess we disagree on what the test should be doing. I agree that it is a
valid test for showing that nothing gets broken when doing the optimization,
but it is not a test that shows
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
--- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-22 16:20:15
UTC ---
I agree. The test is not verifying whether or not snprintf is getting inlined
and that was what bug 47917 was about. This should be a compile test that
looks for snprintf in the assem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48209
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #11 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-21 17:30:34
UTC ---
*** Bug 48191 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48191
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #9 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-18 23:45:07
UTC ---
Andrey,
I was just looking at PR 48191, a bug submitted against GCC 4.5.2. It looks
like it is caused by the same problem that this patch fixes. Can you back port
this fix to the 4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48191
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-18 23:40:43
UTC ---
It looks like this is the same problem as PR 43603 (but with a different error
result). I can reproduce it on the trunk at r167587, but it is fixed at
r167588.
To fix it in the 4.5 br
||2011.03.18 19:33:15
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-18 19:33:15
UTC ---
I can reproduce this using GCC 4.5.2 on HP-UX but I cannot reproduce it with
Top of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48191
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-18 19:31:20
UTC ---
Created attachment 23714
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23714
shorter test case
Shorter test case. Reproducible on IA64 HP-UX as well with -mlp64 (and -O3
-fPIC).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #14 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-17 23:14:22
UTC ---
I ran the GCC testsuite on the compilers I built with the patch and did not
have any regressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
--- Comment #13 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-17 20:10:06
UTC ---
I got good builds on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 and hppa64-hp-hpux11.11. I haven't
done a full test run yet.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48161
Summary: [4.6 regression] hppa*-*-* will not bootstrap on 4.6
branch with release checking
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47866
--- Comment #6 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-09 17:26:44
UTC ---
I tried the patch in comment #2 and verified that it fixes vector-2.c on IA64
HP-UX and Linux and caused no regressions.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
--- Comment #20 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-01 21:50:38
UTC ---
It is still working for me on ia64-hp-hpux11.23 in 32 and 64 bit
modes but it is failing on my ia64-debian-linux-gnu system. I failed to notice
that earlier.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47866
Summary: gcc.dg/torture/vector-2.c fails on IA64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43494
--- Comment #35 from Steve Ellcey 2011-02-09 23:42:57
UTC ---
I think it is PR47614, I tried the first patch in that defect report and it
fixed my test case.
||sje at cup dot hp.com
Resolution|FIXED |
--- Comment #33 from Steve Ellcey 2011-02-09 22:44:20
UTC ---
I am reopening this bug because I am getting a failure of
gcc.dg/torture/vector-2.c that started when this patch was checked in. I think
this is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46997
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46997
Summary: new ia64 vector instructions are broken on HP-UX
(big-endian)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45636
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #93 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-29 22:39:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #92)
> See followup here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01636.html
Ah yes, that's better.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #91 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-29 22:29:10
UTC ---
I just noticed that the latest patch is causing a failure of
gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 with -O1 on my ia64-hp-hpux11.23 platform.
Note that the original bug we were fixing was
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46204
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46204
Summary: g++.dg/torture/stackalign/throw-1.C fails to compile
on IA64
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: link-failure
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46044
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-26 23:46:04
UTC ---
This may be related to PR 43603.
||2010.10.26 23:38:56
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-26 23:38:56
UTC ---
I can reproduce this on the top of the 4.5 branch but not on ToT. I am not
sure if
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46120
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #87 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-19 16:09:57
UTC ---
My testing on 32 bit and 64 bit PA boxes went fine. The patch looks good to
me.
||sje at cup dot hp.com
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-18 21:49:10
UTC ---
Resolved by making IA64 more conservative in its bundling and not putting
multiple (predicated) instructions in one bundle if they read/write
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43760
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970
--- Comment #86 from Steve Ellcey 2010-10-18 19:52:39
UTC ---
I was able to bootstrap the 32 bit PA compiler using the latest patch. I
haven't done a full test run yet but I will do that overnight.
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
