[Bug plugins/120513] Possible arch or configure issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > Have you replaced your system native gcc with a cross compiler...? Ah, nevermind this.

[Bug plugins/120513] Possible arch or configure issue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Have you replaced your system native gcc with a cross compiler...?

[Bug lto/120509] lto-plugin configure fails on cross compiler build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120509 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Why are you passing --enable-bootstrap for a cross build?

[Bug c++/120504] [16 Regression] gcc-16 fails to build llvm-20 and gdb-16.3 unique_ptr.h:91:23: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to incomplete type ... since r16-944-g0629924777ea20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120504 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirme

[Bug rtl-optimization/81501] mulitple calls to __tls_get_addr() with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81501 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #12 from Sam James --- ht

[Bug ada/120496] adaint.h:324:8: error: unknown type name 'cpu_set_t'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120496 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- (In reply to Dennis Clarke from comment #2) > May be trivial to fix given that the error only ever happens in the final > stage of the bootstrap. No, there's a lot more. If it were just this, I would give you

[Bug ada/120496] adaint.h:324:8: error: unknown type name 'cpu_set_t'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120496 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- There's a bunch of porting required to get GNAT working on musl. I may work on it this stage1.

[Bug tree-optimization/120488] [12/13/14/15/16 regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120488 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.5 Keywords|

[Bug sanitizer/120471] [12/13/14/15/16 regression] -fsanitize=undefined causes read of uninitialized variable when accessing element in an array at -O0 level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120471 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.1.0, 15.1.0 Summary|-fsanitiz

[Bug sanitizer/120471] -fsanitize=undefined causes read of uninitialized variable when accessing element in an array at -O0 level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120471 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #2) > I cannot reproduce it locally, nor on godbolt: > https://godbolt.org/z/rxf8Es1n5. Try the C++ FE.

[Bug c/120455] char** and -Wincompatible-pointer-types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120455 --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- (In reply to lavr from comment #5) > Wow, it's a ten year old problem now is breaking the builds because of the > warning to error promotion! The latter should not have been done with the > outstanding problem

[Bug c++/120453] [16 regression] qcoro fails to build its tests (error: use of deleted function ... is implicitly deleted because the default definition would be ill-formed) since r16-773-ge06555a40c0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120453 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- Created attachment 61538 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61538&action=edit reduced.ii

[Bug c++/120453] [16 regression] qcoro fails to build its tests (error: use of deleted function ... is implicitly deleted because the default definition would be ill-formed) since r16-773-ge06555a40c0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120453 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[16 regression] qcoro fails |[16 regression] qcoro fails

[Bug c/120455] char** and -Wincompatible-pointer-types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120455 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- https://x.com/__phantomderp/status/1804967387864691052

[Bug c++/120453] [16 regression] qcoro fails to build its tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120453 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Created attachment 61534 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61534&action=edit partial.cpp.ii.xz Attaching a partial reduction, still running, but it's slow.

[Bug c++/120453] [16 regression] qcoro fails to build its tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120453 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid See Also|

[Bug c++/120453] New: [16 regression] qcoro fails to build its tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120453 Bug ID: 120453 Summary: [16 regression] qcoro fails to build its tests Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug ada/120440] [15/16 regression] gnat exception handling miscompiled (`gnat ls` crashes when bootstrapped with -march=znver3) since r15-8901-g7bec4570301c43

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #4) > It bisects to r15-8901-g7bec4570301c43 which I find very surprising. Double > checked with a build of r15-8900-g525d4a10302113 (which works) and > r15-8901-g7bec4570301c

[Bug ada/120440] [15/16 regression] gnat exception handling miscompiled (`gnat ls` crashes when bootstrapped with -march=znver3) since r15-8901-g7bec4570301c43

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Summary|[15/16 regression] gnat

[Bug ada/120440] [15/16 regression] gnat exception handling miscompiled (`gnat ls` crashes when bootstrapped with -march=znver3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #1 from Sam Jam

[Bug ada/120440] [15/16 regression] gnat exception handling miscompiled (`gnat ls` crashes when bootstrapped with -march=znver3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.2

[Bug ada/120440] New: [15/16 regression] gnat exception handling miscompiled (`gnat ls` crashes when bootstrapped with -march=znver3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440 Bug ID: 120440 Summary: [15/16 regression] gnat exception handling miscompiled (`gnat ls` crashes when bootstrapped with -march=znver3) Product: gcc Version: 16.

[Bug target/120417] gcc -m32 -O1 codegen error, leading to SIGSEGV, workaround -fno-tree-coalesce-vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120417 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/120417] gcc -m32 -O1 codegen error, leading to SIGSEGV, workaround -fno-tree-coalesce-vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120417 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 fr

[Bug target/86792] microblaze port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86792 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- r14-11803-gf644e21ee36440 fixes this but it's missing on releases/gcc-15 and trunk...

[Bug target/119083] Remove SSE_FIRST_REG from ix86_class_likely_spilled_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119083 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #11 from Sam James --- h

[Bug target/118996] Should TARGET_SMALL_REGISTER_CLASSES_FOR_MODE_P return false for x86-64?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118996 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||plugin --- Comment #17 from Sam James ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/111143] [missed optimization] unlikely code slows down diffutils x86-64 ASCII processing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/110823] [missed optimization] >50% speedup for x86-64 ASCII processing a la GNU diffutils

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110823 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-05-25 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/71657] Wrong code on trunk gcc (std::out_of_range), westmere

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71657 --- Comment #15 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #14) > /* Disabled due to PRs 70902, 71453, 71555, 71596 and 71657. */ > > All of those except for PR71453 were dependent on tom's fix (PR83327) so > should be ready to revi

[Bug target/109982] csmith: x86_64: znver1 issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109982 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/115539] Misoptimization of application at -O2 -g on x86-64 causing segfaults on valid memory accesses where it works on both clang and gcc at -g (no -O2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115539 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/120427] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] "and $0,mem" is generated without -Oz since r12-6106-gef26c151c14a87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120427 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Summary|[12/

[Bug tree-optimization/120425] [12/13/14/15/16 regression] GCC-compiled (with -O{1,2,s,3}) program got segfault from GCC 12.1 since r12-476-gd846f225c25c58

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120425 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | Summary|[12/13/14/15/16 regress

[Bug target/120424] [arm] -fnon-call-exceptions -fstack-clash-protection triggers lra-eliminations bug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120424 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug cobol/120422] Reducing strcmp() and strlen() gcc/cobol/genapi.cc at f3a62dcfc96cb24127385a7e668133e037b6085d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120422 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Please send patches to gcc-patches@ (https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html) once they're ready. It's okay to include WIP stuff on Bugzilla, but patches on BZ won't get reviewed seriously or applied.

[Bug target/120417] gcc -m32 -O1 codegen error, leading to SIGSEGV, workaround -fno-tree-coalesce-vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120417 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-source --- Comment #1 from Sam James

[Bug tree-optimization/117423] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] union not written to with particular layout since r10-6321-g636e80eea24b78

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117423 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #59525|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug lto/110710] LTO linker on Windows creates an invalid Makefile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110710 --- Comment #19 from Sam James --- Peter, now that 14.3 is out, maybe propose it as a backport on the ML?

[Bug c++/119930] [15/16 regression] g++.dg/coroutines/torture/pr103953.C FAILs with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119930 --- Comment #12 from Sam James --- (In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #11) > (In reply to Sam James from comment #4) > > -fno-ipa-cp works > > It does not help for me, can you double check, please? I can't reproduce that now either (i.e.

[Bug target/100837] nds32le-linux: error: array subscript 2 is above array bounds of 'rtx_def* [2]'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100837 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/120374] ext-dce fails to realize a shift pair makes bits dead

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120374 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/120392] GCC Segmentation Fault Cross Compiling C++ Source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120392 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- Wait, you're reporting this for GCC 9.3.0? Anything under 12 is EOL.

[Bug c++/120392] GCC Segmentation Fault Cross Compiling C++ Source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120392 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- (In reply to admin from comment #0) > Command triggering issue (as invoked by make): > [...] Please run this with -save-temps appened, then upload camerabuffer.ii (or .cpp.ii). This is the preprocessed source m

[Bug tree-optimization/120376] -fmalloc-dce=0 is not work as expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120376 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- -fno-alloc-dce seems to work. Where did you see =0 documented? I only see https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#index-fno-malloc-dce mentioning 1 and 2.

[Bug c++/120273] [15/16 regression] ICE when building corral since r15-3148-g6303cd7e41546e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120273 --- Comment #7 from Sam James --- ``` [...] ==838291== Invalid read of size 1 ==838291==at 0x8EB7F10: __strcmp_avx2 (strcmp-avx2.S:249) ==838291==by 0x5EF52CE: UnknownInlinedFun (splay-tree.c:151) ==838291==by 0x5EF52CE: UnknownInlin

[Bug ipa/110282] [12/13/14/15 regression] Segmentation fault with specific optimizations since r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110282 --- Comment #23 from Sam James --- Thanks Martin.

[Bug tree-optimization/120358] [15/16 regression] qtbase-6.9.0 miscompiled since r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120358 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61472|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/120358] [15/16 regression] qtbase-6.9.0 miscompiled since r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120358 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Created attachment 61473 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61473&action=edit build.sh

[Bug tree-optimization/120358] New: [15/16 regression] qtbase-6.9.0 miscompiled since r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120358 Bug ID: 120358 Summary: [15/16 regression] qtbase-6.9.0 miscompiled since r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5 Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: need

[Bug target/120356] [15/16 Regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23] since r15-6881-g7b815107f40

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120356 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Summary|[16 Regressio

[Bug target/120347] [15/16 regression] invalid arm32/thumb assembly output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120347 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/120351] [15/16 regression] Assemble failure on armv7-a with -mfpu=neon (ldrex r1, [s14], invalid use of NEON registers) since r15-1579-g792f97b44ffc5e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120351 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfir

[Bug target/120347] [15/16 regression] invalid arm32/thumb assembly output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120347 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug ipa/110282] [12/13/14/15 regression] Segmentation fault with specific optimizations since r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110282 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/118924] [12 regression] Wrong code at -O2 and above leading to uninitialized accesses on aarch64-linux-gnu since r10-917-g3b47da42de621c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118924 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to work|

[Bug target/120351] [15/16 regression] Assemble failure on armv7-a with -mfpu=neon (ldrex r1, [s14], invalid use of NEON registers)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120351 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.2 Summary|ldrex r1, [s14], in

[Bug target/120351] ldrex r1, [s14], invalid use of NEON registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120351 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug target/120351] [15/16 regression] Assemble failure on armv7-a with -mfpu=neon (ldrex r1, [s14], invalid use of NEON registers)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120351 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- For completeness, my pastes are with: $ as --version GNU assembler (Gentoo p1) 2.44.50.20250518

[Bug target/120351] ldrex r1, [s14], invalid use of NEON registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120351 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |target Keywords|

[Bug target/120351] ldrex r1, [s14], invalid use of NEON registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120351 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- ``` # diff -u <(g++-14 /tmp/a.cxx -O2 -S -mfpu=neon -o -) <(g++-15 /tmp/a.cxx -O2 -S -mfpu=neon -o -) --- /dev/fd/63 2025-05-19 10:57:07.663372453 - +++ /dev/fd/62 2025-05-19 10:57:07.666705782 - @@ -3

[Bug target/120347] [15/16 regression] invalid arm32/thumb assembly output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120347 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|invalid arm32/thumb |[15/16 regression] invalid

[Bug lto/120334] New: lto plugin doesn't check for excess section size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120334 Bug ID: 120334 Summary: lto plugin doesn't check for excess section size Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ipa/120307] [16 regression] ICE in combine_with_ipa_count_within, at profile-count.cc:410 during aarch64 -O3 profiledbootstrap since r16-101-g132d01d96ea9d6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120307 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0 Summary|ICE in

[Bug tree-optimization/120322] [16 regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with "-fno-early-inlining" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r16-170-ga670ebde399548

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120322 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/120322] [16 regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with "-fno-early-inlining" on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120322 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|wrong code at -O{s,2,3} |[16 regression] wrong code

[Bug target/107032] ARM: libgcc2.c:2174:1: error: r7 cannot be used in 'asm' here

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107032 --- Comment #10 from Sam James --- Please see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107032#c5.

[Bug fortran/120286] [12/13/14/15/16 regression] [OpenMP] Double free detected when using openmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120286 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[OpenMP] Double free|[12/13/14/15/16 regression]

[Bug c++/119930] [15/6 regression] g++.dg/coroutines/torture/pr103953.C FAILs with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119930 --- Comment #10 from Sam James --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9) > The only difference between the testcase in comment #8 and the one in the > testsuite is that the code is moved to a named function other than main and > then that

[Bug ipa/120099] [16 regression] gfortran.dg/specifics_1.f90 FAILs since r16-372-g064cac730f88dc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120099 --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #5) > ``` > $ gfortran-14 gfortran.dg/specifics_1.f90 -o a -ff2c -O2 --param > max-inline-insns-size=50 && ./a > STOP 1 > ``` It fails with this going back to GCC 9, but GCC

[Bug ipa/120099] [16 regression] gfortran.dg/specifics_1.f90 FAILs since r16-372-g064cac730f88dc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120099 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- ``` $ gfortran-14 gfortran.dg/specifics_1.f90 -o a -ff2c -O2 --param max-inline-insns-size=50 && ./a STOP 1 ```

[Bug ipa/120295] [15/16 Regression] Wrong code on -O3 for trunk version (live code is wrongly eliminated) since r15-6294-g96fb71883d438b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120295 --- Comment #7 from Sam James --- .. and I guess with trunk, it starts to fail with the inlining changes?

[Bug ipa/120295] [15/16 Regression] Wrong code on -O3 for trunk version (live code is wrongly eliminated)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120295 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- (In reply to mcccs from comment #4) > (can't bisect, because) not reproducible on aarch64 What about with -fsigned-char?

[Bug libstdc++/120288] [15/16 regression] spurious null pointer dereference in std::__detail::_Hashtable_base::_M_key_equals since gcc-15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120288 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |libstdc++ Summary|spurious null

[Bug tree-optimization/120277] [16 Regression] Crash at -O2: in upper_bound, at value-range.h:1181 since r16-577-gc40a4cc2d943d8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120277 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[16 Regression] Crash at|[16 Regression] Crash at

[Bug go/118286] go crypto/tls test fails because of expired certificate? (TestVerifyConnection, bad certificate)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118286 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/51859] Linker option effects not reflected in symbol resolution file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51859 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug lto/88643] -Wl,--wrap not supported with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88643 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com --- Comment #16

[Bug libstdc++/108630] build failure in libstdc++ with LTO enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108630 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qubos at outlook dot de --- Comment #7 from

[Bug libstdc++/120266] libstdc++ doesn't support LTO for static linking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120266 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/120278] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Switch expansion generates extra compares with -fno-jump-tables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120278 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10/11/12/13/14/15|[12/13/14/15 Regression]

[Bug c/112556] Null pointer constants with enumeration type are not accepted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112556 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||14.2.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/120273] [15/16 regression] ICE when building corral

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120273 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Are you sure it is valid code because the ice is while trying to print out > an error message. Absolutely not sure ;) With 14, it hangs.

[Bug c++/120273] [15/16 regression] ICE when building corral

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120273 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.2

[Bug c++/120273] [15/16 regression] ICE when building corral

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120273 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- The strange "in pp_string, at pretty-print.cc:2655" is not a copy/paste error, btw.

[Bug c++/120273] New: [15/16 regression] ICE when building corral

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120273 Bug ID: 120273 Summary: [15/16 regression] ICE when building corral Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: c++-coroutines, ice-on-valid-code Severity:

[Bug c++/120273] [15/16 regression] ICE when building corral

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120273 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Created attachment 61422 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61422&action=edit z.ii

[Bug fortran/120225] [F2023] Use mpfr_sinu etc. with mpfr 4.2.0+ for degree trigonometric functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120225 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |16.0

[Bug tree-optimization/120254] [12/13/14/15 regression] wrong code at -O3 -fwrapv on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (-floop-interchange)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120254 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.5 Summary|wrong code at -O3 o

[Bug target/119628] Need better mechanisms to manage register saves in callee for tail calls (inc. preserve_none for x86_64?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119628 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #16 from Sam James --- h

[Bug c/120269] ICE: tree check: expected class type, have exceptional (error_mark) in c_parser_generic_selection, at c/c-parser.cc:9270

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120269 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- If fuzzing, please ideally use releases/gcc-13 rather than 13.1.0.

[Bug cobol/119377] cobol.dg/group1/declarative_1.cob fails (segfaults, uninitialised vars)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377 --- Comment #14 from Sam James --- (In reply to Robert Dubner from comment #13) > But if other testcases are failing, that becomes less attractive. Let me > know. > All in all, I see: cobol.dg/group1/declarative_1.cob cobol.dg/group2/88_leve

[Bug cobol/120244] New: cobol.dg/cgroup2: more Valgrind issues in tests

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120244 Bug ID: 120244 Summary: cobol.dg/cgroup2: more Valgrind issues in tests Product: gcc Version: 16.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: testsuite-fail Severity: normal

[Bug cobol/119377] cobol.dg/group1/declarative_1.cob fails (segfaults, uninitialised vars)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377 --- Comment #12 from Sam James --- Created attachment 61409 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61409&action=edit declarative_1.cob show output (In reply to Robert Dubner from comment #11) ``` (gdb) r Starting program: /usr/li

[Bug target/120242] [15/16 regression] RISC-V: Miscompile at -O[23] since r15-9239-g4d7a634f6d4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120242 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.2 Summary|[15/16 regression]

[Bug cobol/119377] cobol.dg/group1/declarative_1.cob fails (segfaults, uninitialised vars)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119377 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jklowden at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug ipa/110282] [12/13/14/15 regression] Segmentation fault with specific optimizations since r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110282 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.5 Summary|Segmentation fault

[Bug c/120221] Missed optimization related to switch handling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120221 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Can you give a preprocessed testcase please?

[Bug analyzer/120213] analyzer report a false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120213 --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- Looks like it doesn't default to UTF8: https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode/issues/19837.

[Bug analyzer/120213] analyzer report a false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120213 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- I can't reproduce that corrupted output. Did you get that from a CI system or something like that?

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >