https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93475
--- Comment #2 from Simon Hardy-Francis ---
The other two links posted link to this gist [1] which contains a list of the
presumably incorrectly mangled names which fail to demangle. The mangled names
were harvested from g++ assembly files after
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: simonhf at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
When looking at over 100k mangled C++ names, many of them fail to demangle
using common command line tools
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93035
--- Comment #1 from Simon Hardy-Francis ---
Also, for names which do demangle then there are wide spread differences [1] if
the same name is demangled using llvm-cxxfilt. I tried out demangling over 100k
mangled names with both tools here [1].
[
Priority: P3
Component: demangler
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: simonhf at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The list of mangled names failing to demangle with c++filt is here [1]. They
also fail to demangle with the independently implemented c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47712
Summary: optimization (-O) of code using union unexpectedly
causes essential code to be optimized away
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
