--- Comment #13 from shap at eros-os dot org 2006-04-02 06:48 ---
Any patch for gcc-3.4.6?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15068
--- Comment #6 from shap at eros-os dot org 2005-11-05 19:44 ---
I know you folks have many other things to do, but any further ideas on this
one? If not, what can I do to help get the test case confirmed and into the
regression suite?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Comment #5 from shap at eros-os dot org 2005-10-08 22:19 ---
The patch from PR 23043 does NOT resolve this. Same error, reported at the same
place in reload.c.
Given the number of other mode-related bugs against m68k, I was suspicious of
that, but when I re-run under gdb, the value
--- Comment #4 from shap at eros-os dot org 2005-10-08 21:58 ---
Testing the patch now. I'll report back shortly.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24279
--- Comment #2 from shap at eros-os dot org 2005-10-08 21:20 ---
Setting aside whether this particular piece of code is broken (it may be, but
it is a pretty widely used part of newlib), it seems unlikely that a SIGSEGV in
the optimizer would be the preferred diagnostic. ;-)
Jokes
--- Comment #1 from shap at eros-os dot org 2005-10-08 21:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=9942)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9942&action=view)
preprocessed vfprintf.c from newlib for this target.
This is the input file that I am trying to compile. I h
y: SEGV at reload.c:2400 with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: shap at eros-os dot org
GCC host triplet: i68
