https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92172
--- Comment #5 from Seth LaForge ---
Richard:
> No it doesn't. The AAPCS for AArch32 makes no reference to a frame pointer,
> so there is no portable way defined for walking a frame other than by using
> dwarf records or C++ unwinding descriptio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92172
--- Comment #2 from Seth LaForge ---
Good point on frame pointers vs a frame chain for unwinding. I'm looking for
the unwindable frame chain.
Wilco:
> Why does this matter? Well as your examples show, if you want to emit a frame
> chain using st
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sethml at ofb dot net
Target Milestone: ---
This is a bit of a feature request, which has been rejected before, but I think
there are compelling reasons to
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sethml at ofb dot net
Target Milestone: ---
It's a common C++ idiom to clear a struct by assigning a default-constructed
instance to it:
struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70171
Seth LaForge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sethml at ofb dot net
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43640
Seth LaForge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sethml at ofb dot net
--- Comment #3
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sethml at ofb dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 37926
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37926&action=edit
Example C++ code.
Consider the followi
