[Bug middle-end/42794] New: PRE produces illegal PHI node

ponent: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42794

[Bug c++/41131] [4.3 Regression] non-lvalue in unary `&' wrongly accepted

--- Comment #9 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-08-21 18:17 --- This patch works for me. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41131

[Bug c++/41131] New: non-lvalue in unary `&' wrongly accepted

n: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41131

[Bug c++/41127] New: unnamed bitfield declaration parser regression

Summary: unnamed bitfield declaration parser regression Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sergei_lus at

[Bug middle-end/41072] Alias stacked type cast interpretation regression

--- Comment #2 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-08-17 16:35 --- First of all, I agree that a union would work better for type-punning, but... With all the respect I am not convinced that this is the case here. Even if I do something like this: tmp_ch = (char *)&ans; tm

[Bug middle-end/41072] New: Alias stacked type cast interpretation regression

le-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41072

[Bug middle-end/40262] New: Unintended code in find_givs_in_stmt_scev (gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c)?

Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40262

[Bug middle-end/40259] New: Unintended code in find_givs_in_stmt_scev (gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c)?

Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40259

[Bug c++/40225] Mishandled throw/catch

--- Comment #1 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-05-22 15:08 --- Created an attachment (id=17901) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17901&action=view) c++ file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40225

[Bug c++/40225] New: Mishandled throw/catch

t org ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40225

[Bug c++/40224] New: g++ Accepting wrong code

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40224

[Bug middle-end/40223] New: cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining missmatch

AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40223

[Bug middle-end/40208] Redundant (dead) virtual-stack-vars stores related to tree-loop-im

--- Comment #3 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-05-20 21:23 --- Yes. This is the problem. Thank you very much. -- sergei_lus at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/40208] New: Redundant (dead) virtual-stack-vars stores related to tree-loop-im

s stores related to tree-loop-im Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com

[Bug c++/39967] Ignored static qualifier on a local variable

--- Comment #5 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-04-30 19:32 --- Please close this issue. I think the real problem is in libc, not in the compiler. (test passes with -fno-threadsafe-statics). Thank you for support. -- sergei_lus at yahoo dot com changed: What

[Bug c++/39982] New: Fail to use constructor to initialize volatile declaration (no matching function for call)

Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39982

[Bug c++/39967] Ignored static qualifier on a local variable

--- Comment #3 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-04-29 18:02 --- Thanks for prompt response... This is an unsupported target, so I guess i will have to narrow it down a bit. Any suggestions on where to start? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39967

[Bug c++/39967] New: Ignored static qualifier on a local variable

ity: major Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39967

[Bug middle-end/39274] internal compiler error: in check_cfg, at haifa-sched.c, var-tracking

--- Comment #2 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-02-25 17:00 --- Thank you for the suggestion, but... I use schedule_ebbs in machine dependent reorg, and I do call compute_bb_for_insn before it. CFG is messed up before I get there... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug c/39274] New: internal compiler error: in check_cfg, at haifa-sched.c, var-tracking

piler error: in check_cfg, at haifa-sched.c, var-tracking Product: gcc Version: 4.3.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy

[Bug c/38856] loop iv detection failure, SSA autoincrement

--- Comment #2 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-01-15 21:03 --- Andrew, thank you for the prompt reply. I have seen PR 31849 and used the patch suggested. Without it autoincrement would not work at all for either case. But the patch seems to deal with the case when iv _were_

[Bug c/38856] New: loop iv detection failure, SSA autoincrement

AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38856