[Bug fortran/109511] incorrectly rejects set_exponent with constant negative exponent

2023-04-14 Thread sebastien at debian dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109511 --- Comment #5 from Sébastien Villemot --- Thanks for your work on this issue!

[Bug fortran/109512] New: accepts implicit dummy procedure even with "implicit none (external)"

2023-04-14 Thread sebastien at debian dot org via Gcc-bugs
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sebastien at debian dot org Target Milestone: --- gfortran compiles the following source without error: subroutine foo(bar) implicit none (external) call

[Bug fortran/109511] New: incorrectly rejects set_exponent with constant negative exponent

2023-04-14 Thread sebastien at debian dot org via Gcc-bugs
Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sebastien at debian dot org Target Milestone: --- The following program fails to compile: program exponent print *, set_exponent(1., -1) end program exponent With the

[Bug target/58668] New: [arm with hardfp ABI]: internal compiler error: in cond_exec_process_insns, at ifcvt.c:339

2013-10-09 Thread sebastien at debian dot org
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sebastien at debian dot org Created attachment 30969 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30969&action=edit Preprocessed source to replic