[Bug c/33809] Rounding off error in GCC 4.1.2

--- Comment #2 from satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in 2007-10-18 14:00 --- $gcc -ffloat-store round.c $ ./a.out -0.724062 $gcc -O3 -ffloat-store round.c $ ./a.out -0.541341 $gcc -O0 -ffloat-store round.c ./a.out -0.724062 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33809

[Bug c++/33810] New: gcc 4.1.2 mangles results on x86_64 in bitfield operations

gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33810

[Bug c/33809] New: Rounding off error in GCC 4.1.2

igned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33809

[Bug rtl-optimization/33249] -O3 and -O2 give wrong results with gcc 4.1.2 on solaris sparc

--- Comment #2 from satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in 2007-09-01 13:26 --- it is gcc 4.1.2 the base release. Satya -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33249

[Bug c++/33249] New: -O3 and -O2 give wrong results with gcc 4.1.2 on solaris sparc

3.23 If - 23.1 If - 23.23 If - 23.23 satya -- Summary: -O3 and -O2 give wrong results with gcc 4.1.2 on solaris sparc Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ As

[Bug fortran/32987] TAB in FORMAT: accept extension, warn with -std=f*

--- Comment #10 from satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in 2007-08-10 03:27 --- Hi , Any plans to backport. regards Satya -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32987

[Bug fortran/32987] GFortran FORMAT statement error

--- Comment #1 from satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in 2007-08-04 13:56 --- Created an attachment (id=14021) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14021&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32987

[Bug fortran/32987] New: GFortran FORMAT statement error

signedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32987

[Bug libstdc++/32916] file stream error writing large buffers

--- Comment #3 from satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in 2007-07-27 18:40 --- its on X86_64 bit box. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32916

[Bug libstdc++/32916] New: file stream error writing large buffers

Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32916

[Bug fortran/32678] New: GFortan works incorrectly when writing with FORMAT Tx

D Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32678

[Bug fortran/31408] New: :0: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

ompiler error: Illegal instruction Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31408

[Bug target/378] [AIX] gcc cannot compile huge c file

--- Comment #9 from satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in 2007-03-28 09:32 --- Hi, We are getting the same error on AIX 5.3.0.0 , with gcc 3.2.3. any fix for this bug in near future. regards Satya -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=378

[Bug c++/31049] G++ 4.1.1 forgets to allocate memory (skips part of user code)

--- Comment #4 from satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in 2007-03-07 18:07 --- Created an attachment (id=13164) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13164&action=view) assembly code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31049

[Bug c++/31045] gcc4.1. has problems with pointers

--- Comment #3 from satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in 2007-03-05 17:58 --- error we get is as follows case16.cpp: In function 'int main()': case16.cpp:5: error: in argument to unary ! $/grid/common/pkgs/gcc/v4.1.1/bin/g++ -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-redhat-linux

[Bug c++/31049] G++ 4.1.1 forgets to allocate memory (skips part of user code)

--- Comment #1 from satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in 2007-03-05 17:17 --- Created an attachment (id=13147) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13147&action=view) case17 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31049

[Bug c++/31049] New: G++ 4.1.1 forgets to allocate memory (skips part of user code)

code) Product: gcc Version: 4.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug c++/31048] New: G++ 4.1.1 forgets to allocate memory (skips part of user code)

code) Product: gcc Version: 4.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in http

[Bug c++/31047] GCC 4.1.1 has template bug

--- Comment #1 from satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in 2007-03-05 17:11 --- Created an attachment (id=13146) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13146&action=view) test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31047

[Bug c++/31047] New: GCC 4.1.1 has template bug

Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31047

[Bug c++/31045] gcc4.1. has problems with pointers

--- Comment #1 from satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in 2007-03-05 16:58 --- Created an attachment (id=13145) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13145&action=view) test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31045

[Bug c++/31045] New: gcc4.1. has problems with pointers

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31045