--- Comment #10 from sathishpy at gmail dot com 2009-10-12 11:02 ---
Thanks Jakub, this is very useful information.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41644
--- Comment #8 from sathishpy at gmail dot com 2009-10-12 09:46 ---
gcc man page for minimal-toc:
>>This option causes GCC to make 'only one TOC entry' for every file. When you
>>>>specify this option, GCC will produce code that is slower and larger bu
--- Comment #6 from sathishpy at gmail dot com 2009-10-12 09:17 ---
Thanks, I will look at changing our generator to create smaller translation
unit. Meanwhile could you please confirm that -mminimal-toc option is broken
and will be fixed in one of the future releases?
--
http
--- Comment #3 from sathishpy at gmail dot com 2009-10-09 11:22 ---
I tried the same program with -m32 and it works fine. I have also tried it for
10 times bigger time file (10 string constants and 1 functions) without
using -mminimal-toc, so it looks like some issue with gcc
--- Comment #1 from sathishpy at gmail dot com 2009-10-09 10:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=18760)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18760&action=view)
Test program
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41644
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sathishpy at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41644
