--- Comment #3 from sambitdash at gmail dot com 2006-06-05 13:46 ---
>From the C++ standard draft specification
An explicit specialization of any of the following:
function template
class template
member function of a class template
static data member of a class templ
--- Comment #2 from sambitdash at gmail dot com 2006-06-05 06:29 ---
So is:
struct A
{
};
template<> A i;
which means the specilization syntax does not mandate a need the qualifying
class needs to be a template type. That looks interesting!!!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bu
--- Comment #2 from sambitdash at gmail dot com 2006-06-05 06:22 ---
I am not sure if this code is invalid.
It's no different from saying:
struct B
{
struct A;
};
A is just a forward declaration here.
In the following code is not invalid but the statement ::A is innocuou
